1 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 UNITED ACADEMICS PROPOSAL
3 ARTICLE 12
4 NTTF EVALUATION and PROMOTION
6 Section 1. All departments and programs that employ non-tenure-track faculty must have
7 a faculty-approved evaluation and promotion criteria policy for their NTTF. This policy
8 shall be made available to faculty and must be published on the Academic Affairs
9 website. Revisions to these criteria may not be applied so as to materially harm a
10 currently-employed faculty member’s progress toward promotion.
12 While the details and structure of NTTF evaluation are the responsibility of the
13 immediate academic unit in which the appointment is made, evaluations must follow
14 some general guidelines:
16 1. NTTF should be evaluated every 18 courses taught or 3 calendar years, whichever
17 comes first, but NTTF can request more frequent evaluations.
19 2. NTTF in instructional appointments are expected to have student course
20 evaluations offered for all courses with 10 or more students, and will undergo at
21 least one peer review of teaching each year. NTFF must be provided notice of the
22 standards for teaching on which he or she will be evaluated. The academic unit
23 shall identify the standards to be applied to such evaluation, and shall establish a
24 time frame for notification to the faculty member before a peer review is
27 3. NTTF in research appointments will be evaluated for the quality of the effort
28 expended and the outcomes of their contributions to the research program.
30 4. NTTF will be asked to discuss their efforts and performance with their immediate
31 supervisor at least once each evaluation period.
33 5. NTTF will submit a 3-5 page personal statement developed by the faculty
34 member that describes his or her conceptual, theoretical scholarly orientation,
35 productivity, service work, and impact. This personal statement should
36 correspond to the structure and general content expected of the statement that will
37 be required for promotion.
39 6. NTTF can only be evaluated on his or her professional development activities that
40 require funding in relation to the access they have had to professional
41 development funding from their department.
422 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Evaluations of NTTF are for the purpose of determining if the faculty member is meeting
2 the standard of excellence appropriate to a major research university. They should be
3 designed to help the faculty member grow as a scholar, identify areas of strength, and
4 identify areas that need improvement. If the faculty member is a Career NTTF, the
5 evaluation must indicate if the faculty member is progressing toward promotion. If the
6 faculty member is not progressing toward promotion, the evaluation should identify
7 specific areas for improvement.
9 Section 2. Only Career NTTF are eligible for promotion. Career NTTF will be eligible
10 for promotion to the first senior level after accumulating eighteen (18) terms (consecutive
11 or not) of service, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic year.
13 Section 3. Promotion is elective and does not involve an “up-or-out” decision.
14 Candidates wishing to be considered for promotion should notify their appropriate unit
15 head in the year prior to the year when promotion is sought, or equivalent FTE, in rank.
16 Career NTTF who do not wish to be considered for promotion may continue employment
17 at their current rank as long as eligible to do so under Article 9, Contracts.
19 An accelerated promotion review can occur in a meritorious case or when credit for prior
20 service at another institution has led to a contractual agreement to this effect at the time
21 of hire. The terms of hire should make clear where on the timeline an individual faculty
22 member stands; from that time on, subsequent advances in rank will be awarded
23 according to established promotion procedures. In all other cases in which credit for prior
24 service at another institution is agreed upon, scholarly work completed by the faculty
25 member during those years will receive full consideration during the promotion process.
27 Should a faculty member who has agreed to an accelerated review at the time of hire
28 choose to delay that review for the full six years of full time service, scholarly work
29 completed prior to arrival at the University of Oregon will be of secondary consideration
30 during the promotion and tenure process and consideration of scholarly achievement will
31 focus on work completed during the six full time years of service at the University of
34 Section 4. For faculty members holding multiple or joint appointments, a Memorandum
35 of Understanding will be entered into at the time of hire or assignment between the
36 different employing units specifying the expectations for promotion and tenure review.
38 Section 5. The Family Leave policy can affect the timing of promotion by “stopping the
39 clock” for a pre-specified and contractual period of time. Faculty members considering
40 such leaves should consult Article 24, Leave and the Office of Human Resources Leaves
41 Website. Faculty members should discuss the timing of leave and its relation to the
42 promotion decision with the department head who may also consult with the dean and the 3 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 provost to ensure that there is appropriate and clear written documentation of leave
4 Promotion Review
5 Section 6. Academic and research units must have on file and provide to their Career
6 NTTF statements of criteria for evaluation and promotion of Career NTTF. A unit’s
7 promotion review process will commonly include a review committee, and this
8 committee should include NTTF at or above the rank sought by the candidate in addition
9 to any tenure-track faculty. At no point in the review process can a faculty member be
10 evaluated by any standards other than those on file and provided to the faculty member.
12 Each unit, with appropriate communication with the appropriate dean/director, should
13 determine whether or not external review will be included as part of the review and
14 promotion process for Career NTTF. If external reviewers are included, reviewers should
15 be those who can present an unbiased, knowledgeable, and objective evaluation of the
16 candidate and his/her qualifications. Eternal reviewers must base his or her evaluation
17 and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.
19 Internally, it is to be expected that those serving in supervisory roles to the candidate
20 (e.g., department head for Instructors, research mentor for Research Assistants, etc.) –
21 will provide letters of evaluation.
23 Required elements of a promotion file include:
25 Statement of duties and responsibilities
26 A candidate’s statement
27 Letters of evaluation.
28 Candidate may propose names of qualified outside referees, some of whom will
29 be contacted, if necessary
30 Statement of waiver, partial waiver, or non-waiver
31 Conditions of appointment
32 Departmental criteria for promotion
33 Memorandum(s) of Understanding between departments in the case of joint
35 Teaching evaluations and supplemental teaching materials
36 Evidence of professional activities
37 Department committee recommendation
38 Department head’s evaluation and recommendation
39 Dean’s Advisory Committee recommendation, where applicable
40 Dean’s evaluation and recommendation
41 Voting summary4 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Section 7. Faculty members may choose to waive in advance their legal right of access to
2 see the evaluative materials submitted by all referees in conjunction with their promotion
3 and/or tenure review. Such waivers shall not, however, preclude redacted versions of
4 these documents may, however, being used during the denial of promotion appeals
5 process described in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
7 Section 8. Faculty members shall receive at least three (3) days notice of any meeting or
8 hearing related to the promotion process and an agenda for the meeting. Faculty members
9 have the right to have a Union representative or colleague present at any such hearings or
12 Section 9. Following the unit’s review and evaluation of the promotion file, the unit
13 head or director will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
14 voting summary and his/her independent recommendation. If the unit chooses to have a
15 unit-level review committee prepare a report and recommendation, this report should be
16 included with the unit head or director’s report.
18 The file will then be sent to the dean of the academic unit in which the department is
21 Section 10. Individual colleges may or may not choose to include a review by an
22 advisory committee prior to the dean’s recommendation. If they do, it will be necessary
23 for that college to constitute an appropriate NTTF Dean’s Advisory Committee (NTTF-
24 DAC), comprised primarily of tenured or tenure-track faculty, but also including
25 members who are themselves NTTF.
27 The dean (or other appropriate administrative head, for those units not reporting through
28 an academic dean) will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
31 The file will then be sent to Academic Affairs.
33 Section 11. The Provost will review the file, with input from Academic Affairs and/or the
34 Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation, and make a decision as to
35 whether to grant or deny promotion.
37 This notification will be provided in writing to the candidate by June 15.
39 Section 12. If, at any point in the promotion process a faculty member receives a
40 negative vote or evaluation, he or she will be notified, provided an written explanation of
41 the negative vote or evaluation from the appropriate supervisor (i.e., department head,
42 dean, Provost, or President), and the opportunity to submit rebuttal material within ten
43 (10) days.5 December 13 and 14, 2012
2 Section 13. Successful candidates for promotion will assume their new rank beginning
3 with the following Fall term, or the nearest next term of employment should their
4 contract not begin with the Fall term.
6 Successful candidates for promotion will receive a salary adjustment of at least 10%,
7 effective simultaneously with assumption of the new rank (see Article 20, Salary).
9 Section 14. Faculty who are denied promotion may appeal the decision through the
10 procedures in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
12 Unsuccessful candidates for promotion will remain employed at their current rank, as
13 long as their failure to achieve promotion was not for reasons that warrant termination
14 (see Article 9, Contracts or Article 18, Discipline and Termination). Career NTTF who
15 are terminated will receive timely notice and a terminal contract. If NTTF have served
16 three (3) or more years at .50 FTE or greater, they will receive the same timely notice as
17 tenure-track faculty (i.e., a year’s notice of non-renewal).
19 Career NTTF who are unsuccessful at securing promotion may be considered for
20 promotion again after accumulating an additional nine (9) terms (consecutive or not) of
21 service at .50 FTE or greater, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic
23 Section 15. NTTF holding “affiliate,” “adjunct,” “visiting,” “fellow,” “postdoctoral” or
24 “emeriti,” appointments are not eligible for promotion. All faculty, however, shall have
25 the right to petition for rank reclassification if they believe that their work was
26 misclassified at the time of first hire or their position has evolved to more closely
27 resemble a different classification.
28 Adjunct NTTF who believe that their positions should be Career NTTF appointments,
29 can petition for reclassification after completing their second year of appointment and/or
30 evaluation as described in this Article (see also Article 2, Academic Rank).
Google Ads – all profits for single malt
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < Euler's number. Please use a screen name.
- Will Duck AD Ron Mullens... (4)
- More in Eugene Wish I could uprate this 100x. Helfrich is a very rich man, a mediocre coach, and a terrible leader. Don't buy the rosy face on... – Sunday
- uomatters Right on. Contact our swag office for your complimentary UO Matters coffee cup. – Sunday
- Won't someone think of the millionaires? ...this is what you find shameful? There are dozens of UO football players right now who don't know if they will receive a scholarship next... – Sunday
- UOGrad The way Mullens treated Helfrich is shameful. All the money aside, leaving him swinging in the wind for days and having him face a news... – Saturday
- Potential Duck coach saw Sandusky... (6)
- eugenenative Knight is Paterno apologist #1. – Saturday
- Publius Phil Knight, who will have some influence on the head coach hiring, famously defended Joe Paterno's actions in the Sandusky case--saying the "true tragedy" lay... – Saturday
- No Excuse This Time, President Schill If President Schill allows the UO to hire as head football coach someone with a documented history of failing to report the sexual abuse of... – Saturday
- Totally Shameless You're talking about the Ducks. We just gave a big raise to Dana Altman, who is still pretending that he didn't ask Ed Cooley what... – Friday
- Shame on everyone involved "I came to Rutgers as a boy and left a man." Meanwhile, the boys who came to Penn State left severely damaged while Schiano stood... – Friday
- Publius Schiano's statements on this have been inconsistent. Asked about the incident in 2011, a columnist for the Washington Post reported "He totally evaded the question".... – Friday
- Day 2: Liveish-blog, Board of... (7)
- dog My experience at the UO suggests the schism between the sciences and the other units on campus is unnecessarily deep and the perception of many... – Saturday
- honest Uncle Bernie No direct evidence. And I don't mean it will likely suck away ordinary operating funds. But it seeks $500M in matching donations over 10 years.... – Saturday
- uomatters What evidence do you have that the Knight Campus will suck money from the existing campus? – Saturday
- honest Uncle Bernie You are right, enrollment dropping, and this is a concern, a financial concern. A danger of tuition hikes leading to more enrollment declines, with a... – Saturday
- honest Uncle Bernie far too high judged by which criteria? – Saturday
- Diane Dietz I'm no economist, but I can recognize a sloping line however gently it drifts: For undergraduates, according to IR: 2012 20,829 2013 20,808 2014 20,569... – Friday
- Not a scientist or a faculty member UOs tuition is far too high. I truly sympathize with the students and their parents. – Friday
- General Counsel will investigate Pintens's... (2)
- UO Senate votes for "Peace... (11)
- dog dear editor yes that is an excellent point. In Academics it really is all about passive aggression, unlike the visceral and physical direct aggression asserted... – Thursday
- uomatters I don't know. But running with the metaphor now the Senate has until September to break the Duck code and ramp up Spitfire production. – Thursday
- From someone who hates the dishonesty I am a Senator who voted for keeping the Senate IAC (in the form of Bill Harbaugh's proposed amendment which was voted down narrowly). What... – Thursday
- Former IAC member Cutsy comments do not replace leadership. Surrendering on athletics and allowing the administration to remove the Senate from the free speech discourse? Not a good... – Thursday
- Former IAC member cdsinclair, the theory of a representational governance system is that the elected representatives are supposed to represent their constituents, not cave in to executive/administrative pressure.... – Thursday
- uomatters Referee #2 likes this. If you revise it to read "the spirit of passive aggression", I'll consider a resubmission for comment of the week, depending... – Thursday
- Dog well personally I have always thought that barbarous paganism and the spirit of aggression dominates academic pursuits and politics. – Thursday
- Winnie There can never be friendship between the academic side and the athletic department, that power which spurns Christian ethics, which cheers its onward course by... – Thursday
- Day 1: Liveish-blog, Board of... (12)
- honest Uncle Bernie Good point about the IRS limits. UO should at least announce that there are no PERS implications of the buyout -- the latter being bad... – Thursday
- More in Eugene I believe the evidence is strong that investments in higher education yield greater net economic development than more traditional tax incentives and a lot more... – Thursday
- uomatters The new IRS income limits probably prevent a Belottiesque PERS payout. To evade them, UO has set up a special extra retirement scheme for highly... – Thursday
- honest Uncle Bernie Another thing -- they ought to talk about how greedy UO looks asking for $100 million from the state to make the Knight campus as... – Thursday
- honest Uncle Bernie They better talk about the Governor's proposed budget. From the Oregonian story: "Funding for community colleges and higher education, meanwhile, would contain no built-in cost... – Thursday
- AD Mullens buys out Duck... (26)
- uomatters Stop free-riding off the people who subscribe, and pay the RG their money. They earn it. – Wednesday
- Moonman Why can't you make a deal with RG to post an occasional article for free? I realize the importance of a paywall, but the RG... – Wednesday
- uomatters Please don't. I need the google ad revenue for my bar bill down at the Faculty Club. – Wednesday
- Dog Start you own blog then UOother_matters.com – Wednesday
- honest Uncle Bernie Another thing -- there are other matters at UO besides the constant athletics fiascoes, and the Halloween party business, and the new Faculty Lounge. Will... – Wednesday
- honest Uncle Bernie To all the PERS recipients out there -- especially the Tier 1 people -- who are pissed off about Helfrich's buyout: Remember, a contract is... – Wednesday
- dog Fearless predictions for UOmatters archive Next Duck Football coach: 1. Lane Kiffin 2. Chip Kelly returns 3. PJ Fleck (current favorite) 4. Greg Schiano (dark... – Wednesday
- Senate meets 3-5PM today in... (2)
- uomatters About $30K. The money was found under the rich corinthian leather cushions of the $160M Hatfield-Dowling Center for Football Excellence. – Wednesday
- Older »
- Will Duck AD Ron Mullens... (4)
- Will Duck AD Ron Mullens hire a Harbaugh disciple to replace Matt Helfrich? https://t.co/hekYCHhg8a, 16 hours ago
- RT @Deadspin: Oregon to investigate athletic department for response to reports of violence by football player Pharaoh Brown:… https://t.co/6ytQ5Ad9tm, Dec 4
- Potential Duck coach saw Sandusky in the shower doing something to a kid, didn’t report it https://t.co/UUwbNNFytY, Dec 3
- RT @kennyjacoby: Pres. Schill has agreed to let GC Reed investigate the UO Athletic Department for a possible Free Speech violation https://t.co/kGiU7bHG1S, Dec 2
- UO Senate votes for “Peace in our time” with Ducks, hands over Intercollegiate Athletics Committee https://t.co/vI3uXPQpdJ, Dec 1
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) free speech Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing Lorraine Davis March 8-9 rape allegations Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robin Holmes Rob Mullens Scott Coltrane Senate Sharon Rudnick Students Uncategorized UO Administration UO Foundation UO Presidential Archives UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- UO lawyers post summaries of Dana Altman’s players calls with Jane Doe 12/05/2016
- Will Duck AD Ron Mullens hire a Harbaugh disciple to replace Matt Helfrich? 12/03/2016
- Potential Duck coach saw Sandusky in the shower with kid, didn’t report? 12/02/2016
- Oregon State’s Jock Mills posts an informative budget report 12/02/2016
- Day 2: Liveish-blog, Board of Trustees Th & Fr in Portland 12/02/2016
- General Counsel will investigate Pintens’s restrictions on athletes’ free speech 12/01/2016
- Day 1: Liveish-blog, Board of Trustees Th & Fr in Portland 12/01/2016
- UO Senate votes for “Peace in our time”, hands IAC to Ducks 11/30/2016
- Senate meets 3-5PM today in the Crater Lake room, Fac Club 5-8PM 11/30/2016
- AD Mullens buys out Duck basketball coach Don Altman for 12 Gottfredsons 11/29/2016
- All hail the HECC’s glorious 5-year college productivity plan! 11/28/2016
- Prof. Ed Coleman talked to Shurtz, thinks law faculty & Schill reacted poorly 11/23/2016
- Sign me up for the Professor Watchlist! 11/22/2016
- Assoc Athletic Director for Communications charged with assaulting reporter 11/21/2016
- Lorry Lokey comes through for the Knight Law School, honoring Frohnmayer 11/21/2016
- Remember the Hat Day: November 21 11/20/2016
- Duck PR flack Dave Williford threatens to revoke student-reporter’s press pass 11/20/2016
- Student condemns the administration’s proposed free speech TPM restrictions 11/19/2016
- Still more unsportsmanlike conduct from Duck football players 11/18/2016
- UO Board member calls for denaming Gerlinger Hall 11/17/2016
UO Board Chair Chuck Lillis's grade so far
- A (10%, 30 Votes)
- B (5%, 15 Votes)
- C (13%, 39 Votes)
- D (23%, 66 Votes)
- F (49%, 142 Votes)
Total Voters: 292Loading ...
President Mike Schill's grade so far
- A (23%, 113 Votes)
- B (29%, 140 Votes)
- C (17%, 80 Votes)
- D (12%, 56 Votes)
- F (19%, 92 Votes)
Total Voters: 481Loading ...