1 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 UNITED ACADEMICS PROPOSAL
3 ARTICLE 12
4 NTTF EVALUATION and PROMOTION
6 Section 1. All departments and programs that employ non-tenure-track faculty must have
7 a faculty-approved evaluation and promotion criteria policy for their NTTF. This policy
8 shall be made available to faculty and must be published on the Academic Affairs
9 website. Revisions to these criteria may not be applied so as to materially harm a
10 currently-employed faculty member’s progress toward promotion.
12 While the details and structure of NTTF evaluation are the responsibility of the
13 immediate academic unit in which the appointment is made, evaluations must follow
14 some general guidelines:
16 1. NTTF should be evaluated every 18 courses taught or 3 calendar years, whichever
17 comes first, but NTTF can request more frequent evaluations.
19 2. NTTF in instructional appointments are expected to have student course
20 evaluations offered for all courses with 10 or more students, and will undergo at
21 least one peer review of teaching each year. NTFF must be provided notice of the
22 standards for teaching on which he or she will be evaluated. The academic unit
23 shall identify the standards to be applied to such evaluation, and shall establish a
24 time frame for notification to the faculty member before a peer review is
27 3. NTTF in research appointments will be evaluated for the quality of the effort
28 expended and the outcomes of their contributions to the research program.
30 4. NTTF will be asked to discuss their efforts and performance with their immediate
31 supervisor at least once each evaluation period.
33 5. NTTF will submit a 3-5 page personal statement developed by the faculty
34 member that describes his or her conceptual, theoretical scholarly orientation,
35 productivity, service work, and impact. This personal statement should
36 correspond to the structure and general content expected of the statement that will
37 be required for promotion.
39 6. NTTF can only be evaluated on his or her professional development activities that
40 require funding in relation to the access they have had to professional
41 development funding from their department.
422 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Evaluations of NTTF are for the purpose of determining if the faculty member is meeting
2 the standard of excellence appropriate to a major research university. They should be
3 designed to help the faculty member grow as a scholar, identify areas of strength, and
4 identify areas that need improvement. If the faculty member is a Career NTTF, the
5 evaluation must indicate if the faculty member is progressing toward promotion. If the
6 faculty member is not progressing toward promotion, the evaluation should identify
7 specific areas for improvement.
9 Section 2. Only Career NTTF are eligible for promotion. Career NTTF will be eligible
10 for promotion to the first senior level after accumulating eighteen (18) terms (consecutive
11 or not) of service, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic year.
13 Section 3. Promotion is elective and does not involve an “up-or-out” decision.
14 Candidates wishing to be considered for promotion should notify their appropriate unit
15 head in the year prior to the year when promotion is sought, or equivalent FTE, in rank.
16 Career NTTF who do not wish to be considered for promotion may continue employment
17 at their current rank as long as eligible to do so under Article 9, Contracts.
19 An accelerated promotion review can occur in a meritorious case or when credit for prior
20 service at another institution has led to a contractual agreement to this effect at the time
21 of hire. The terms of hire should make clear where on the timeline an individual faculty
22 member stands; from that time on, subsequent advances in rank will be awarded
23 according to established promotion procedures. In all other cases in which credit for prior
24 service at another institution is agreed upon, scholarly work completed by the faculty
25 member during those years will receive full consideration during the promotion process.
27 Should a faculty member who has agreed to an accelerated review at the time of hire
28 choose to delay that review for the full six years of full time service, scholarly work
29 completed prior to arrival at the University of Oregon will be of secondary consideration
30 during the promotion and tenure process and consideration of scholarly achievement will
31 focus on work completed during the six full time years of service at the University of
34 Section 4. For faculty members holding multiple or joint appointments, a Memorandum
35 of Understanding will be entered into at the time of hire or assignment between the
36 different employing units specifying the expectations for promotion and tenure review.
38 Section 5. The Family Leave policy can affect the timing of promotion by “stopping the
39 clock” for a pre-specified and contractual period of time. Faculty members considering
40 such leaves should consult Article 24, Leave and the Office of Human Resources Leaves
41 Website. Faculty members should discuss the timing of leave and its relation to the
42 promotion decision with the department head who may also consult with the dean and the 3 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 provost to ensure that there is appropriate and clear written documentation of leave
4 Promotion Review
5 Section 6. Academic and research units must have on file and provide to their Career
6 NTTF statements of criteria for evaluation and promotion of Career NTTF. A unit’s
7 promotion review process will commonly include a review committee, and this
8 committee should include NTTF at or above the rank sought by the candidate in addition
9 to any tenure-track faculty. At no point in the review process can a faculty member be
10 evaluated by any standards other than those on file and provided to the faculty member.
12 Each unit, with appropriate communication with the appropriate dean/director, should
13 determine whether or not external review will be included as part of the review and
14 promotion process for Career NTTF. If external reviewers are included, reviewers should
15 be those who can present an unbiased, knowledgeable, and objective evaluation of the
16 candidate and his/her qualifications. Eternal reviewers must base his or her evaluation
17 and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.
19 Internally, it is to be expected that those serving in supervisory roles to the candidate
20 (e.g., department head for Instructors, research mentor for Research Assistants, etc.) –
21 will provide letters of evaluation.
23 Required elements of a promotion file include:
25 Statement of duties and responsibilities
26 A candidate’s statement
27 Letters of evaluation.
28 Candidate may propose names of qualified outside referees, some of whom will
29 be contacted, if necessary
30 Statement of waiver, partial waiver, or non-waiver
31 Conditions of appointment
32 Departmental criteria for promotion
33 Memorandum(s) of Understanding between departments in the case of joint
35 Teaching evaluations and supplemental teaching materials
36 Evidence of professional activities
37 Department committee recommendation
38 Department head’s evaluation and recommendation
39 Dean’s Advisory Committee recommendation, where applicable
40 Dean’s evaluation and recommendation
41 Voting summary4 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Section 7. Faculty members may choose to waive in advance their legal right of access to
2 see the evaluative materials submitted by all referees in conjunction with their promotion
3 and/or tenure review. Such waivers shall not, however, preclude redacted versions of
4 these documents may, however, being used during the denial of promotion appeals
5 process described in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
7 Section 8. Faculty members shall receive at least three (3) days notice of any meeting or
8 hearing related to the promotion process and an agenda for the meeting. Faculty members
9 have the right to have a Union representative or colleague present at any such hearings or
12 Section 9. Following the unit’s review and evaluation of the promotion file, the unit
13 head or director will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
14 voting summary and his/her independent recommendation. If the unit chooses to have a
15 unit-level review committee prepare a report and recommendation, this report should be
16 included with the unit head or director’s report.
18 The file will then be sent to the dean of the academic unit in which the department is
21 Section 10. Individual colleges may or may not choose to include a review by an
22 advisory committee prior to the dean’s recommendation. If they do, it will be necessary
23 for that college to constitute an appropriate NTTF Dean’s Advisory Committee (NTTF-
24 DAC), comprised primarily of tenured or tenure-track faculty, but also including
25 members who are themselves NTTF.
27 The dean (or other appropriate administrative head, for those units not reporting through
28 an academic dean) will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
31 The file will then be sent to Academic Affairs.
33 Section 11. The Provost will review the file, with input from Academic Affairs and/or the
34 Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation, and make a decision as to
35 whether to grant or deny promotion.
37 This notification will be provided in writing to the candidate by June 15.
39 Section 12. If, at any point in the promotion process a faculty member receives a
40 negative vote or evaluation, he or she will be notified, provided an written explanation of
41 the negative vote or evaluation from the appropriate supervisor (i.e., department head,
42 dean, Provost, or President), and the opportunity to submit rebuttal material within ten
43 (10) days.5 December 13 and 14, 2012
2 Section 13. Successful candidates for promotion will assume their new rank beginning
3 with the following Fall term, or the nearest next term of employment should their
4 contract not begin with the Fall term.
6 Successful candidates for promotion will receive a salary adjustment of at least 10%,
7 effective simultaneously with assumption of the new rank (see Article 20, Salary).
9 Section 14. Faculty who are denied promotion may appeal the decision through the
10 procedures in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
12 Unsuccessful candidates for promotion will remain employed at their current rank, as
13 long as their failure to achieve promotion was not for reasons that warrant termination
14 (see Article 9, Contracts or Article 18, Discipline and Termination). Career NTTF who
15 are terminated will receive timely notice and a terminal contract. If NTTF have served
16 three (3) or more years at .50 FTE or greater, they will receive the same timely notice as
17 tenure-track faculty (i.e., a year’s notice of non-renewal).
19 Career NTTF who are unsuccessful at securing promotion may be considered for
20 promotion again after accumulating an additional nine (9) terms (consecutive or not) of
21 service at .50 FTE or greater, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic
23 Section 15. NTTF holding “affiliate,” “adjunct,” “visiting,” “fellow,” “postdoctoral” or
24 “emeriti,” appointments are not eligible for promotion. All faculty, however, shall have
25 the right to petition for rank reclassification if they believe that their work was
26 misclassified at the time of first hire or their position has evolved to more closely
27 resemble a different classification.
28 Adjunct NTTF who believe that their positions should be Career NTTF appointments,
29 can petition for reclassification after completing their second year of appointment and/or
30 evaluation as described in this Article (see also Article 2, Academic Rank).
Google Ads – all profits for single malt
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < Euler's number. Please use a screen name.
- UO Senate committee aims to... (1)
- dog well they can;'t make it worse, that;s for sure! – Wednesday
- Admin declares student protester guilty,... (36)
- Right Free Speech In cracking down on progressive free speech in the name of free speech, the UOrwell is once again on the cutting edge of a negative... – Tuesday
- Payroll Guy Just because someone is Jewish doesn't put them above supporting oppression. Actions are the true gauge, not your identity. – Friday
- uomatters Or http://uomatters.com/2017/09/uo-is-failing-on-economic-diversity-wheres-the-diversity-action-plan.html for highlites of the UO data. Worth pointing out that Pres Schill's plan for spending the $50M includes a CoE initiative which is... – Saturday
- link https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/18/upshot/some-colleges-have-more-students-from-the-top-1-percent-than-the-bottom-60.html?_r=1&mtrref=undefined – Saturday
- Mandatory Implicit Bias Training starts... (5)
- uomatters Got a link? – Tuesday
- Check out the Search Advocate training at Oregon State University. It's coordinated out of Academic Affairs and was featured in the Chronicle of Higher Education. – Tuesday
- uomatters I agree. It's tough to mix science and advocacy without going off the rails in one direction or another - particularly when you're being paid... – Thursday
- too much caffeine I thought it was interesting and that Erik did a good job. – Thursday
- Dog Yes I have already bitched, extensively, that this mandatory check box is insulting and a waste of time for faculty. But no one above us... – Thursday
- Oregon soccer takes a knee... (10)
- Fishwrapper Sports is the locale, not the context. – Tuesday
- Max Powers Are you sure? I read a lot about sports on here.... – Tuesday
- Niccolo M Does anybody actually realize that kneeling is a higher form of reverence than standing? Shouldn't every "real" American kneel? – Monday
- uomatters Thanks for your comment, but this is not really a sports blog. – Monday
- Julia Ward Howe Readers may better know the later song that borrowed the melody from this, "Battle Hymn of the Republic." – Monday
- Sports Fan Surprised the entire team hasn't been suspended or disbanded. Based on results on the pitch, that would have occurred years ago. – Monday
- uomatters Yeah, I've always preferred "John Brown's Body:" John Brown’s body lies moldering in the grave, While weep the sons of bondage whom he ventured all... – Monday
- What a country "No refuge could save the hireling and slave From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave," Our national anthem contains a line... – Monday
- Duck AD Rob Mullens fails... (11)
- bah humbug Good job Pres run this place into the ground one expensive Administrator at a time. – Monday
- Suey! Thanks for reporting on the outrageous duck pork. Keep up the good work. The board should be all over Rob's robbery, but they're AWOL. If... – Sunday
- Niccolo M And how about tuition increases? Staff and faculty have unions that will speak for them and might thereby indirectly, magically, limit unreasonably high spending on... – Sunday
- Presidents and provosts gather in... (2)
- solidcitizen "It is a business. We sell education certificates for tuition money." Right. And when our customers are telling us that we are charging too much... – Monday
- Conservative duck "Marginalized students don’t have a voice on campus..." I'm sorry, what? The Daily Emerald seems to be available to you. Do you not have a... – Monday
- Faculty Union ratifies contract extension... (6)
- uomatters Sorry, but to quote Julius Caesar or at least some screenwriter for HBO's Rome series, "arithmetic has no mercy". You will be missed. – Thursday
- Simplius Simplicissimus You are right, I should have looked up the exact number of folks in the bargaining unit. I based the 259 votes cast on 2000,... – Thursday
- uomatters Thanks, that's About 25% of the members, or 16% of the bargaining unit. – Wednesday
- notamathprof The letter that UoMatters links to says 250-9. That's 259 in my math class. – Wednesday
- uomatters I'm so sorry that your colleagues have disappointed you, and that you can't do basic math. – Tuesday
- Simplius Simplicissimus 259 votes? That's barely above 10% of the UA constituency, no? Voting was exceedingly simple, I feel disappointed by the turn-out. – Tuesday
- RG explains UO plans for... (14)
- Other flagships I wonder how our operating costs and numbers of out-of-state students compare with OSU? – Wednesday
- Focused anger cuts Feel free to develop and share your proposal to address administrative bloat, and be sure to share your numbers, and name those administrators you would... – Wednesday
- Thomas Hager Oregon could do a lot better with higher ed funding. But if I'm reading this data right, the state this biennium is providing as much... – Wednesday
- Focused anger cuts Problem is, as you surely know, the people of the state of Oregon not enrolled at the university "decided" to essentially stop funding us. So,... – Wednesday
- Thomas Hager It's a form of bait-and-switch. The UO was established as a public university by the people of the state for the education of students from... – Tuesday
- uomatters You're right, that's the focus for now. Sorry for being snappish. – Monday
- a big change This is all just preparation for UO enrolling a majority of out of state students. For a few years UO has been obsessed with having... – Monday
- UO community member The Knight Campus is a step in the right direction and I support this endeavor. However, it is my understanding that it will enroll a... – Monday
- Today: CAS holds student town... (1)
- Economic Diversity Thank you for continuing to focus on the growing lack of economic diversity at the UO. This is truly where the diversity rhetoric rubber meets... – Wednesday
- No truth to rumors Nazi's... (1)
- Max Powers Renault: Everybody is to leave here immediately! This cafe is closed until further notice. Clear the room, at once! Rick: How can you close me... – Wednesday
- Full text of Pres Mike... (2)
- Conservative duck Black Cultural Center? Why? Why not Tibetan? Or Palestinian? How is this supposed to make me feel "included and welcome"? Students chanting "This is a... – Monday
- Older »
- UO Senate committee aims to... (1)
- UO administration declares student protester guilty, *then* starts conduct code investigation - https://t.co/MprOG26kaT, 2 hours ago
- RT @cjciaramella: My man Harold Cross, former legal counsel to the American Society of News Editors: https://t.co/fHjuAk2W6l, 11 hours ago
- RT @MarshallYoum: Trump's anti-press attacks undercutting US prestige as a torchbearer of freedom & democracy. https://t.co/hQV3Rn7b7D @Sulliview's column., 11 hours ago
- Former basketball player files lawsuit against Duck Coach Dana Altman - https://t.co/2a9aiPJB7K, 14 hours ago
- RT @jackpitcher20: Former basketball recruit sues UO coaches after tearing his ACL during workout: https://t.co/cFCZkxekUN, 18 hours ago
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) free speech Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing Lorraine Davis March 8-9 rape allegations Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robert Berdahl Rob Mullens Scott Coltrane Senate Sharon Rudnick Tim Gleason Track and Field Championships Uncategorized UO Foundation UO Presidential Archives UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- UO Senate Agenda to include important UOPD announcement 10/18/2017
- UO Senate committee aims to improve student course evaluation process 10/17/2017
- Former basketball player files lawsuit against Duck Coach Dana Altman 10/17/2017
- Admin declares student protester guilty, then starts conduct code investigation 10/17/2017
- Today: CAS holds student town hall on “Diversity Action Plans” 10/17/2017
- Health Center nurse files discrimination, retaliation lawsuit 10/16/2017
- Oregon soccer takes a knee – what will Altman and Wiltshire do? 10/16/2017
- Presidents and provosts gather in their safe-space to talk free speech 10/16/2017
- Duck AD Rob Mullens fails to show UO the money, gets 71% pay cut 10/15/2017
- Former interim UO Provost Frances Bronet gets her dream job at Pratt 10/12/2017
- Mandatory Implicit Bias Training starts by noting IBT doesn’t change behavior 10/12/2017
- No truth to rumors Nazi’s have shut down the UO Faculty Club 10/10/2017
- Faculty Union ratifies contract extension 250-9 10/10/2017
- LA Times wants a copy of any FBI subpoenas of Dana Altman’s Ducks 10/09/2017
- UO Public Records Office doing its best to hide Tim Gleason’s docs 10/09/2017
- RG explains UO plans for 3K more out-of-state students 10/09/2017
- Editor withdraws pro-colonialism paper after credible threats of violence 10/09/2017
- Full text of Pres Mike Schill’s 2017 State of the University speech 10/06/2017
- Vin Lananna’s Tracktown non-profit sets up “Oregon 21” for-profit LLC to spend state’s $25M IAAF subsidy 10/05/2017
- UO supporter Lorry Lokey is a generous and funny guy 10/05/2017
UO Board Chair Chuck Lillis's grade so far
- A (10%, 30 Votes)
- B (5%, 15 Votes)
- C (13%, 39 Votes)
- D (23%, 66 Votes)
- F (49%, 142 Votes)
Total Voters: 292Loading ...
President Mike Schill's grade so far
- A (23%, 113 Votes)
- B (29%, 140 Votes)
- C (17%, 80 Votes)
- D (12%, 56 Votes)
- F (19%, 92 Votes)
Total Voters: 481Loading ...