1 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 UNITED ACADEMICS PROPOSAL
3 ARTICLE 12
4 NTTF EVALUATION and PROMOTION
6 Section 1. All departments and programs that employ non-tenure-track faculty must have
7 a faculty-approved evaluation and promotion criteria policy for their NTTF. This policy
8 shall be made available to faculty and must be published on the Academic Affairs
9 website. Revisions to these criteria may not be applied so as to materially harm a
10 currently-employed faculty member’s progress toward promotion.
12 While the details and structure of NTTF evaluation are the responsibility of the
13 immediate academic unit in which the appointment is made, evaluations must follow
14 some general guidelines:
16 1. NTTF should be evaluated every 18 courses taught or 3 calendar years, whichever
17 comes first, but NTTF can request more frequent evaluations.
19 2. NTTF in instructional appointments are expected to have student course
20 evaluations offered for all courses with 10 or more students, and will undergo at
21 least one peer review of teaching each year. NTFF must be provided notice of the
22 standards for teaching on which he or she will be evaluated. The academic unit
23 shall identify the standards to be applied to such evaluation, and shall establish a
24 time frame for notification to the faculty member before a peer review is
27 3. NTTF in research appointments will be evaluated for the quality of the effort
28 expended and the outcomes of their contributions to the research program.
30 4. NTTF will be asked to discuss their efforts and performance with their immediate
31 supervisor at least once each evaluation period.
33 5. NTTF will submit a 3-5 page personal statement developed by the faculty
34 member that describes his or her conceptual, theoretical scholarly orientation,
35 productivity, service work, and impact. This personal statement should
36 correspond to the structure and general content expected of the statement that will
37 be required for promotion.
39 6. NTTF can only be evaluated on his or her professional development activities that
40 require funding in relation to the access they have had to professional
41 development funding from their department.
422 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Evaluations of NTTF are for the purpose of determining if the faculty member is meeting
2 the standard of excellence appropriate to a major research university. They should be
3 designed to help the faculty member grow as a scholar, identify areas of strength, and
4 identify areas that need improvement. If the faculty member is a Career NTTF, the
5 evaluation must indicate if the faculty member is progressing toward promotion. If the
6 faculty member is not progressing toward promotion, the evaluation should identify
7 specific areas for improvement.
9 Section 2. Only Career NTTF are eligible for promotion. Career NTTF will be eligible
10 for promotion to the first senior level after accumulating eighteen (18) terms (consecutive
11 or not) of service, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic year.
13 Section 3. Promotion is elective and does not involve an “up-or-out” decision.
14 Candidates wishing to be considered for promotion should notify their appropriate unit
15 head in the year prior to the year when promotion is sought, or equivalent FTE, in rank.
16 Career NTTF who do not wish to be considered for promotion may continue employment
17 at their current rank as long as eligible to do so under Article 9, Contracts.
19 An accelerated promotion review can occur in a meritorious case or when credit for prior
20 service at another institution has led to a contractual agreement to this effect at the time
21 of hire. The terms of hire should make clear where on the timeline an individual faculty
22 member stands; from that time on, subsequent advances in rank will be awarded
23 according to established promotion procedures. In all other cases in which credit for prior
24 service at another institution is agreed upon, scholarly work completed by the faculty
25 member during those years will receive full consideration during the promotion process.
27 Should a faculty member who has agreed to an accelerated review at the time of hire
28 choose to delay that review for the full six years of full time service, scholarly work
29 completed prior to arrival at the University of Oregon will be of secondary consideration
30 during the promotion and tenure process and consideration of scholarly achievement will
31 focus on work completed during the six full time years of service at the University of
34 Section 4. For faculty members holding multiple or joint appointments, a Memorandum
35 of Understanding will be entered into at the time of hire or assignment between the
36 different employing units specifying the expectations for promotion and tenure review.
38 Section 5. The Family Leave policy can affect the timing of promotion by “stopping the
39 clock” for a pre-specified and contractual period of time. Faculty members considering
40 such leaves should consult Article 24, Leave and the Office of Human Resources Leaves
41 Website. Faculty members should discuss the timing of leave and its relation to the
42 promotion decision with the department head who may also consult with the dean and the 3 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 provost to ensure that there is appropriate and clear written documentation of leave
4 Promotion Review
5 Section 6. Academic and research units must have on file and provide to their Career
6 NTTF statements of criteria for evaluation and promotion of Career NTTF. A unit’s
7 promotion review process will commonly include a review committee, and this
8 committee should include NTTF at or above the rank sought by the candidate in addition
9 to any tenure-track faculty. At no point in the review process can a faculty member be
10 evaluated by any standards other than those on file and provided to the faculty member.
12 Each unit, with appropriate communication with the appropriate dean/director, should
13 determine whether or not external review will be included as part of the review and
14 promotion process for Career NTTF. If external reviewers are included, reviewers should
15 be those who can present an unbiased, knowledgeable, and objective evaluation of the
16 candidate and his/her qualifications. Eternal reviewers must base his or her evaluation
17 and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.
19 Internally, it is to be expected that those serving in supervisory roles to the candidate
20 (e.g., department head for Instructors, research mentor for Research Assistants, etc.) –
21 will provide letters of evaluation.
23 Required elements of a promotion file include:
25 Statement of duties and responsibilities
26 A candidate’s statement
27 Letters of evaluation.
28 Candidate may propose names of qualified outside referees, some of whom will
29 be contacted, if necessary
30 Statement of waiver, partial waiver, or non-waiver
31 Conditions of appointment
32 Departmental criteria for promotion
33 Memorandum(s) of Understanding between departments in the case of joint
35 Teaching evaluations and supplemental teaching materials
36 Evidence of professional activities
37 Department committee recommendation
38 Department head’s evaluation and recommendation
39 Dean’s Advisory Committee recommendation, where applicable
40 Dean’s evaluation and recommendation
41 Voting summary4 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Section 7. Faculty members may choose to waive in advance their legal right of access to
2 see the evaluative materials submitted by all referees in conjunction with their promotion
3 and/or tenure review. Such waivers shall not, however, preclude redacted versions of
4 these documents may, however, being used during the denial of promotion appeals
5 process described in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
7 Section 8. Faculty members shall receive at least three (3) days notice of any meeting or
8 hearing related to the promotion process and an agenda for the meeting. Faculty members
9 have the right to have a Union representative or colleague present at any such hearings or
12 Section 9. Following the unit’s review and evaluation of the promotion file, the unit
13 head or director will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
14 voting summary and his/her independent recommendation. If the unit chooses to have a
15 unit-level review committee prepare a report and recommendation, this report should be
16 included with the unit head or director’s report.
18 The file will then be sent to the dean of the academic unit in which the department is
21 Section 10. Individual colleges may or may not choose to include a review by an
22 advisory committee prior to the dean’s recommendation. If they do, it will be necessary
23 for that college to constitute an appropriate NTTF Dean’s Advisory Committee (NTTF-
24 DAC), comprised primarily of tenured or tenure-track faculty, but also including
25 members who are themselves NTTF.
27 The dean (or other appropriate administrative head, for those units not reporting through
28 an academic dean) will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
31 The file will then be sent to Academic Affairs.
33 Section 11. The Provost will review the file, with input from Academic Affairs and/or the
34 Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation, and make a decision as to
35 whether to grant or deny promotion.
37 This notification will be provided in writing to the candidate by June 15.
39 Section 12. If, at any point in the promotion process a faculty member receives a
40 negative vote or evaluation, he or she will be notified, provided an written explanation of
41 the negative vote or evaluation from the appropriate supervisor (i.e., department head,
42 dean, Provost, or President), and the opportunity to submit rebuttal material within ten
43 (10) days.5 December 13 and 14, 2012
2 Section 13. Successful candidates for promotion will assume their new rank beginning
3 with the following Fall term, or the nearest next term of employment should their
4 contract not begin with the Fall term.
6 Successful candidates for promotion will receive a salary adjustment of at least 10%,
7 effective simultaneously with assumption of the new rank (see Article 20, Salary).
9 Section 14. Faculty who are denied promotion may appeal the decision through the
10 procedures in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
12 Unsuccessful candidates for promotion will remain employed at their current rank, as
13 long as their failure to achieve promotion was not for reasons that warrant termination
14 (see Article 9, Contracts or Article 18, Discipline and Termination). Career NTTF who
15 are terminated will receive timely notice and a terminal contract. If NTTF have served
16 three (3) or more years at .50 FTE or greater, they will receive the same timely notice as
17 tenure-track faculty (i.e., a year’s notice of non-renewal).
19 Career NTTF who are unsuccessful at securing promotion may be considered for
20 promotion again after accumulating an additional nine (9) terms (consecutive or not) of
21 service at .50 FTE or greater, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic
23 Section 15. NTTF holding “affiliate,” “adjunct,” “visiting,” “fellow,” “postdoctoral” or
24 “emeriti,” appointments are not eligible for promotion. All faculty, however, shall have
25 the right to petition for rank reclassification if they believe that their work was
26 misclassified at the time of first hire or their position has evolved to more closely
27 resemble a different classification.
28 Adjunct NTTF who believe that their positions should be Career NTTF appointments,
29 can petition for reclassification after completing their second year of appointment and/or
30 evaluation as described in this Article (see also Article 2, Academic Rank).
Google Ads – all profits go to buy scotch
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < Euler’s number. Please use a screen name.
- Black Student Task Force releases... (15)
- doh Here is a CHE article that talks about a similar list at another college. http://chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/occidental-faculty-weighs-system-for-reports-of-microaggressions In reviewing this information I found the Atlantic article that... – Wednesday
- Hart I can't decide if you are kidding. Would you care to elaborate? Because I am given to understand that Black students experience a pretty unfunny... – Wednesday
- lol Might as well, because coach sure as hell isn't going to let anyone join the BSU, make a "don't shoot" or "I can't breathe" gesture,... – Tuesday
- wishy washy liberals .....if the vast majority of intercollegiate athletes on a campus are African-American might it be argued by some that the athlete only resources (eg., the... – Tuesday
- anonymous Doing what you are talking about would probably require beefing up the endowment by a few billion. Have you lined up the funding? And, I... – Monday
- anonymous Maybe if UO wants to honor Yasui, it could do it with some class, by raising money for a NEW building to name after him.... – Monday
- Why students have more courage Faculty debate quickly leads to some bullshit arguing about something like Hadrian and Agrippa, instead of doing something useful. Watch any senate meeting. – Monday
- "Do it quick." That's a good motto, the timeline for things changing at UO and the tectonic plates is pretty similar. – Monday
- Rename Judge Deady Hall for... (36)
- Alec H. Boyd Good points! I didn't know that history either. – Tuesday
- Phillip Drummond I agree! In polite society we don't call racists out by name, nor do we worry about the symbols of our racist past. These kids... – Tuesday
- just different I'm also descended from groups persecuted by the KKK, and I also don't give a crap about Dunn Hall. Know why? Because I'm white. If... – Tuesday
- uomatters Princeton is currently going through a similar debate, about taking Woodrow Wilson's name of the school of public policy. I thought this was a pretty... – Tuesday
- anonymous "What did he do for the University beyond serving as a Professor?" Now that is a kind of telling statement. But let that pass. I... – Tuesday
- Alec H. Boyd The best source appears to be The Invisible Empire in the West edited by Shawn Lay which has a chapter on the KKK in Eugene... – Tuesday
- uomatters I don't know much about Dunn. Do you have any links? – Tuesday
- Alec H. Boyd If I were in charge of the UO, I'd rename Dunn Hall (and Yasui is as worthy a person for the honor as anyone) and... – Tuesday
- CNN reports on UO retaliation,... (4)
- Did you ever get an apology? Says some crackpot who left in disgrace from the U of O, uh, I mean teaching at Oxford. Just so you know, Phil's received apologies... – Monday
- Cheyney Ryan The CNN story reminds us of an issue that the U of O adm has still not addressed, despite its insistence on putting past events... – Sunday
- uomatters My recollection is that Park's office admitted opening the sealed envelopes and scanning the records to pdfs. They said that they then resealed the envelopes,... – Sunday
- a morsel for the plaintiff UO carefully words its responses to say that their attorneys didn't open the counseling records it demanded from Morlok. It makes sure not to mention... – Sunday
- Remember the Hat Day: November... (2)
- uomatters Old Man, you are hereby instructed to prepare a complete report on the history of the UO Constitution and Policy on Policies, of between 2000... – Sunday
- Old Man During his presidency, The Hat engaged in serious negotiations with a Senate Committee charged with creating a Constitution that would restore the Faculty’s historic role... – Sunday
- Ombud Bruce McAllister to leave... (13)
- (No Longer) Working GTF This news, on top of the discouraging proposals (and lack of any any economic proposals once again) from the first round of GTFF bargaining brings... – Saturday
- Fishwrapper I'm sure there are some provincial types in the Portland area who have not heard of the R-G, or the Weekly, either. And they don't... – Friday
- Dog not sure "dirty, dirty" is the correct descriptor protectionist and myopic may be better descriptors – Friday
- all have plenty to hide such a dirty, dirty place UO is – Friday
- Dysfunction The two independent offices - Internal Audit and the Ombuds. If this is true it is not good. I hope people keep an eye on... – Friday
- Buzz If true, this would be a serious loss for the UO; someone whose few public presentations exhibited more balance and understanding of what it takes... – Friday
- AL Mr Schill’s famous press release on August 4 (“I do not believe any of our coaches, administrators, or other university personnel acted wrongfully, nor do... – Friday
- uomatters It's anonymous, tell us what you know. Around the Oops certainly isn't going to tell us anything about the auditor or this! – Friday
- Gambling, guns, and an acid-test... (7)
- uomatters And 4 aces, instead of the Dead Man's Hand? – Saturday
- UO's Steve Mital gets transparent... (11)
- uomatters It's shocking how shocking it was to see an elected official do his job interacting with citizens. Thanks to the Fourth Estate for facilitating. Now... – Saturday
- Ilene Aleshire Mr. Mital first commented on the Seneca contract in response to questions posted by readers on the R-G website in response to a guest column... – Friday
- Diane Dietz The R-G business reporters have written long and well about tax breaks given to businesses. I expect that will continue as the details emerge. – Friday
- Payroll Guy http://www.eweb.org/commissioners/helgeson – Friday
- uomatters Hey Payroll Guy - Don't be shy, name names. It's anonymous. – Thursday
- uomatters Mital explains why EWEB can't open up the records in the RG article. Next time, please read the article before posting a comment. – Thursday
- Pres Schill and VP Alex-Assensoh... (1)
- honest Uncle Bernie I hope it's a fruitful discussion. On a related matter, got an email from Equity and Inclusion about a vigil re terror attacks. It contains... – Friday
- Schill: Obviously, if I get... (17)
- uomatters Thanks for your comment HUB, but next time please note the UO M policy against making fun of people's names. Thanks, Bill Hardballs – Friday
- uomatters I don't know the specifics here, but it's pretty common to see changes in an online story these days. The reporter writes and posts the... – Friday
- Older »
- Black Student Task Force releases... (15)
- RT @MarshallYoum: Posting a link to defamatory article not republication in libel law. https://t.co/l61ypHwjkP @ericgoldman's case comment., 5 hours ago
- RT @DamianCollins: Aspects of the crisis engulfing the #IAAF already eclipse FIFA's corruption scandals | My interview w @sarahsportmag https://t.co/ScklgUPOKA, 11 hours ago
- RT @DamianCollins: Even though Seb Coe has given up his Nike job there are still questions to answer about the awarding of the Eugene 2021 world championships, 11 hours ago
- RT @guardian: Sebastian Coe steps down from ambassadorial role with Nike https://t.co/cZr03V8Elu, 11 hours ago
- UO Board posts materials for Dec 2,3 meetings: On the Board of Trustees website, here: Academic and Student Af... https://t.co/roZ0ddDzDZ, Nov 26
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing Lorraine Davis March 8-9 rape allegations Martinez's (Diversity VP) 2nd $150K job Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robert Berdahl Rob Mullens Scott Coltrane Senate Sharon Rudnick Students Uncategorized UO Administration UO Foundation UO Presidential Archives UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- Lord Coe quits Nike, French cops investigating Track Town bid 11/26/2015
- UO Board posts materials for Dec 2, 3 meetings 11/25/2015
- Duck softball stadium gets 32 foot long jumbotron 11/24/2015
- Governor’s aide doubted UO Trustees’ higher ed experience 11/23/2015
- Vote in faculty by-election for PTRAC and FPC by tomorrow 11/23/2015
- IRS must pay $250K to Malamud’s lawyers in 990 FOIA case 11/23/2015
- Rename Judge Deady Hall for Minoru Yasui? 11/23/2015
- CNN reports on UO retaliation, will air Hunting Ground despite libel threat 11/22/2015
- Remember the Hat Day: November 21, 2015 11/22/2015
- Black Student Task Force releases list of demands for administration 11/21/2015
- Adidas takes on Nike in bid for Eugene School District sports gear 11/21/2015
- Ombud Bruce McAllister to leave UO 11/21/2015
- Pres Schill and VP Alex-Assensoh call for Campus conversation on racial equity 11/20/2015
- UO’s Steve Mital gets transparent about EWEB costs 11/18/2015
- Gambling, guns, and an acid-test for UO’s free speech policy 11/18/2015
- Law Dean Michael Moffitt to explain how he got $10M from general tuition fund 11/18/2015
- Third AVP/TIXC candidate withdraws, feedback needed on #1 and #2 11/18/2015
- FSU Pres John Thrasher calls out Hunting Ground over Jameis Winston story 11/18/2015
- Sec of State releases public records audit: Agencies should delete more records 11/17/2015
- Ducks to let regular UO students go upstairs at Jock Box 11/17/2015