1 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 UNITED ACADEMICS PROPOSAL
3 ARTICLE 12
4 NTTF EVALUATION and PROMOTION
6 Section 1. All departments and programs that employ non-tenure-track faculty must have
7 a faculty-approved evaluation and promotion criteria policy for their NTTF. This policy
8 shall be made available to faculty and must be published on the Academic Affairs
9 website. Revisions to these criteria may not be applied so as to materially harm a
10 currently-employed faculty member’s progress toward promotion.
12 While the details and structure of NTTF evaluation are the responsibility of the
13 immediate academic unit in which the appointment is made, evaluations must follow
14 some general guidelines:
16 1. NTTF should be evaluated every 18 courses taught or 3 calendar years, whichever
17 comes first, but NTTF can request more frequent evaluations.
19 2. NTTF in instructional appointments are expected to have student course
20 evaluations offered for all courses with 10 or more students, and will undergo at
21 least one peer review of teaching each year. NTFF must be provided notice of the
22 standards for teaching on which he or she will be evaluated. The academic unit
23 shall identify the standards to be applied to such evaluation, and shall establish a
24 time frame for notification to the faculty member before a peer review is
27 3. NTTF in research appointments will be evaluated for the quality of the effort
28 expended and the outcomes of their contributions to the research program.
30 4. NTTF will be asked to discuss their efforts and performance with their immediate
31 supervisor at least once each evaluation period.
33 5. NTTF will submit a 3-5 page personal statement developed by the faculty
34 member that describes his or her conceptual, theoretical scholarly orientation,
35 productivity, service work, and impact. This personal statement should
36 correspond to the structure and general content expected of the statement that will
37 be required for promotion.
39 6. NTTF can only be evaluated on his or her professional development activities that
40 require funding in relation to the access they have had to professional
41 development funding from their department.
422 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Evaluations of NTTF are for the purpose of determining if the faculty member is meeting
2 the standard of excellence appropriate to a major research university. They should be
3 designed to help the faculty member grow as a scholar, identify areas of strength, and
4 identify areas that need improvement. If the faculty member is a Career NTTF, the
5 evaluation must indicate if the faculty member is progressing toward promotion. If the
6 faculty member is not progressing toward promotion, the evaluation should identify
7 specific areas for improvement.
9 Section 2. Only Career NTTF are eligible for promotion. Career NTTF will be eligible
10 for promotion to the first senior level after accumulating eighteen (18) terms (consecutive
11 or not) of service, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic year.
13 Section 3. Promotion is elective and does not involve an “up-or-out” decision.
14 Candidates wishing to be considered for promotion should notify their appropriate unit
15 head in the year prior to the year when promotion is sought, or equivalent FTE, in rank.
16 Career NTTF who do not wish to be considered for promotion may continue employment
17 at their current rank as long as eligible to do so under Article 9, Contracts.
19 An accelerated promotion review can occur in a meritorious case or when credit for prior
20 service at another institution has led to a contractual agreement to this effect at the time
21 of hire. The terms of hire should make clear where on the timeline an individual faculty
22 member stands; from that time on, subsequent advances in rank will be awarded
23 according to established promotion procedures. In all other cases in which credit for prior
24 service at another institution is agreed upon, scholarly work completed by the faculty
25 member during those years will receive full consideration during the promotion process.
27 Should a faculty member who has agreed to an accelerated review at the time of hire
28 choose to delay that review for the full six years of full time service, scholarly work
29 completed prior to arrival at the University of Oregon will be of secondary consideration
30 during the promotion and tenure process and consideration of scholarly achievement will
31 focus on work completed during the six full time years of service at the University of
34 Section 4. For faculty members holding multiple or joint appointments, a Memorandum
35 of Understanding will be entered into at the time of hire or assignment between the
36 different employing units specifying the expectations for promotion and tenure review.
38 Section 5. The Family Leave policy can affect the timing of promotion by “stopping the
39 clock” for a pre-specified and contractual period of time. Faculty members considering
40 such leaves should consult Article 24, Leave and the Office of Human Resources Leaves
41 Website. Faculty members should discuss the timing of leave and its relation to the
42 promotion decision with the department head who may also consult with the dean and the 3 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 provost to ensure that there is appropriate and clear written documentation of leave
4 Promotion Review
5 Section 6. Academic and research units must have on file and provide to their Career
6 NTTF statements of criteria for evaluation and promotion of Career NTTF. A unit’s
7 promotion review process will commonly include a review committee, and this
8 committee should include NTTF at or above the rank sought by the candidate in addition
9 to any tenure-track faculty. At no point in the review process can a faculty member be
10 evaluated by any standards other than those on file and provided to the faculty member.
12 Each unit, with appropriate communication with the appropriate dean/director, should
13 determine whether or not external review will be included as part of the review and
14 promotion process for Career NTTF. If external reviewers are included, reviewers should
15 be those who can present an unbiased, knowledgeable, and objective evaluation of the
16 candidate and his/her qualifications. Eternal reviewers must base his or her evaluation
17 and judgment on the criteria in use by the academic department or program.
19 Internally, it is to be expected that those serving in supervisory roles to the candidate
20 (e.g., department head for Instructors, research mentor for Research Assistants, etc.) –
21 will provide letters of evaluation.
23 Required elements of a promotion file include:
25 Statement of duties and responsibilities
26 A candidate’s statement
27 Letters of evaluation.
28 Candidate may propose names of qualified outside referees, some of whom will
29 be contacted, if necessary
30 Statement of waiver, partial waiver, or non-waiver
31 Conditions of appointment
32 Departmental criteria for promotion
33 Memorandum(s) of Understanding between departments in the case of joint
35 Teaching evaluations and supplemental teaching materials
36 Evidence of professional activities
37 Department committee recommendation
38 Department head’s evaluation and recommendation
39 Dean’s Advisory Committee recommendation, where applicable
40 Dean’s evaluation and recommendation
41 Voting summary4 December 13 and 14, 2012
1 Section 7. Faculty members may choose to waive in advance their legal right of access to
2 see the evaluative materials submitted by all referees in conjunction with their promotion
3 and/or tenure review. Such waivers shall not, however, preclude redacted versions of
4 these documents may, however, being used during the denial of promotion appeals
5 process described in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
7 Section 8. Faculty members shall receive at least three (3) days notice of any meeting or
8 hearing related to the promotion process and an agenda for the meeting. Faculty members
9 have the right to have a Union representative or colleague present at any such hearings or
12 Section 9. Following the unit’s review and evaluation of the promotion file, the unit
13 head or director will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
14 voting summary and his/her independent recommendation. If the unit chooses to have a
15 unit-level review committee prepare a report and recommendation, this report should be
16 included with the unit head or director’s report.
18 The file will then be sent to the dean of the academic unit in which the department is
21 Section 10. Individual colleges may or may not choose to include a review by an
22 advisory committee prior to the dean’s recommendation. If they do, it will be necessary
23 for that college to constitute an appropriate NTTF Dean’s Advisory Committee (NTTF-
24 DAC), comprised primarily of tenured or tenure-track faculty, but also including
25 members who are themselves NTTF.
27 The dean (or other appropriate administrative head, for those units not reporting through
28 an academic dean) will prepare a report on the merits of the promotion case, including a
31 The file will then be sent to Academic Affairs.
33 Section 11. The Provost will review the file, with input from Academic Affairs and/or the
34 Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation, and make a decision as to
35 whether to grant or deny promotion.
37 This notification will be provided in writing to the candidate by June 15.
39 Section 12. If, at any point in the promotion process a faculty member receives a
40 negative vote or evaluation, he or she will be notified, provided an written explanation of
41 the negative vote or evaluation from the appropriate supervisor (i.e., department head,
42 dean, Provost, or President), and the opportunity to submit rebuttal material within ten
43 (10) days.5 December 13 and 14, 2012
2 Section 13. Successful candidates for promotion will assume their new rank beginning
3 with the following Fall term, or the nearest next term of employment should their
4 contract not begin with the Fall term.
6 Successful candidates for promotion will receive a salary adjustment of at least 10%,
7 effective simultaneously with assumption of the new rank (see Article 20, Salary).
9 Section 14. Faculty who are denied promotion may appeal the decision through the
10 procedures in Article 14, Tenure Denial Grievance.
12 Unsuccessful candidates for promotion will remain employed at their current rank, as
13 long as their failure to achieve promotion was not for reasons that warrant termination
14 (see Article 9, Contracts or Article 18, Discipline and Termination). Career NTTF who
15 are terminated will receive timely notice and a terminal contract. If NTTF have served
16 three (3) or more years at .50 FTE or greater, they will receive the same timely notice as
17 tenure-track faculty (i.e., a year’s notice of non-renewal).
19 Career NTTF who are unsuccessful at securing promotion may be considered for
20 promotion again after accumulating an additional nine (9) terms (consecutive or not) of
21 service at .50 FTE or greater, accrued at no greater than three (3) terms per academic
23 Section 15. NTTF holding “affiliate,” “adjunct,” “visiting,” “fellow,” “postdoctoral” or
24 “emeriti,” appointments are not eligible for promotion. All faculty, however, shall have
25 the right to petition for rank reclassification if they believe that their work was
26 misclassified at the time of first hire or their position has evolved to more closely
27 resemble a different classification.
28 Adjunct NTTF who believe that their positions should be Career NTTF appointments,
29 can petition for reclassification after completing their second year of appointment and/or
30 evaluation as described in this Article (see also Article 2, Academic Rank).
Google Ads – all profits go to buy G&T’s
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < Euler's number. Please use a screen name.
- UO Public Records Office doesn't... (5)
- just different When people can stop calling it "diversity." – Tuesday
- Anonymous At what point can we say we have reached our goal of "diversity"? – Tuesday
- New Year Cat What diversity practices? Looking at all the new dean hires, I'd say our "lack of" diversity practices..... – Sunday
- honest Uncle Bernie UO has gotten a good deal of well-deserved ridicule over its BRT stuff. Having FIRE on the case will only make it better. I'm also... – Sunday
- Quackster It's clear that FIRE needs a visit from a BRT "re-education" squad. – Saturday
- UO's Jesús Sepúlveda lays out... (3)
- Dog About to go teach a liberal arts class, in fact. To UOmatters - I believe you need to re-title and leave the words "liberal arts"... – Tuesday
- Captain Nemo I have no problem with the summary in points 1-11, but the connection to what follows is not compelling. The fact that administrative bloat continues,... – Tuesday
- Competition is a little bit like physics... It happens whether or not you believe in it or want it to. – Tuesday
- Investigation of how university handled... (1)
- Alec H. Boyd Serious question because I've lost the thread of our thought: What exactly is your point on this topic?: (1) That UO botched its handling of... – Tuesday
- UO pays Cleavenger $1M for... (5)
- samsonite A new frat, Beta Omicron Delta, should be established for the sole purpose of staging fundraisers to defray legal fees for the many law suits... – Monday
- AAEO website has wrong info... (8)
- uomatters Do you have particular examples of how she is being used by JH, and of what she is covering for? – Monday
- Dog And most of these same comments/charges were leveled against the previous VPFA. So I would say our tolerance is quite a bit higher than ZERO,... – Sunday
- motheaten I've had to go through an ugly review, and I know others who have had to be a part of drawn-out nonsensical inquiries. I want... – Saturday
- Zero Tolerance For Incompetence What's it gonna take for people to realize the VPFA is the root of all this incompetence and chaos. Look at her portfolio of failures.... – Saturday
- Dirt on people going back to the Frohnmayer era. Think J. Edgar. If she ever leaves it's going to be on her terms. – Friday
- Penny Has to Go Why am I not surprised that the perpetually uninformed Penny Daugherty has failed to notice that, unlike her AAEO website, UO's Human Resources office has... – Friday
- Anonymous She has been here a long time & knows lots of secrets. – Thursday
- Thought I was anonymous Providing factually incorrect information to sexual assault survivors goes way, way beyond incompetence. Thanks for posting this. – Thursday
- Shelton & Moffitt to discuss... (3)
- Captain Nemo All true, and nothing new. Yet administrative bloat continues. I know the CAS office has been at least temporarily reduced, tho it too expanded very... – Saturday
- Dog Boy do I have a lot of comments here but no will read a lengthy list so here is the short and direct version. 1.... – Friday
- Elliot Berkman My 2c after the meeting: The change in state appropriations since 2008 is the single biggest problem with the budget. That is not news, but... – Friday
- Baylor fires Ken Starr after... (2)
- Federal Court rules students should... (1)
- John Abbe The Eugene Weekly just posted a great article on the high barriers that Oregon and Eugene governments place in the way of people seeking public... – Friday
- UO students mock Duck, "Go... (2)
- Today: Senate to elect new... (11)
- cdsinclair Thanks to Informed Citizen and Old Man for the congratulations (and to all who voted for me). I fully appreciate the fact that the framers... – Thursday
- Can We Get Along? Dear Old Man and Informed Citizen (and one can hope that Chris, the Senate president-elect and Bill, the new Senate president are reading this): Old... – Thursday
- Old Man Let me add my congratulations to Chris to those of "informed citizen.". And while I’m here, let me comment on “Informed citizens” suggestion regarding “academic... – Wednesday
- Informed citizen Congratulations Chris. I'd like to point out that you truncated the quote from the Constitution about academic matters. The full statement is: "Sole faculty governance... – Wednesday
- cdsinclair All of this is academic. *If* I win VP/Pres, and *If* President Schill thinks I am worthy enough to be on his leadership team, and... – Wednesday
- Old Man In response to candidate cdsinclair, I offer a few quotes from the UO Constitution. I then explain the importance of these quotes as applied to... – Wednesday
- President Schill lays out process... (28)
- Douglas Card Thank you "Anonymous" for your comments to Alec Boyd on the significance of Mathew Deady's pro-slavery actions. They help "flesh out" the his role at... – Wednesday
- Diane Dietz reveals info on... (8)
- @ UOmatters Don't be too dismissive here concerning "what do deans actually do"? I think its a legitimate question. I have known and worked with... – Wednesday
- uomatters You can't be serious. Please find another blog to post your comments on. Thanks. – Tuesday
- Schillflation What do deans actually do? It doesn't seem like there salaries correspond to the number of staff in they supposedly manage. Some even have there... – Tuesday
- UO frat boys complete weekend... (10)
- Sports Fan Let it be known which fraternities campaign to smear the names and words of survivors of sexual assault first. – Tuesday
- Frat dude on UOM? From a frat boy, I completely agree with you. Why does the university need to recognize us/claim us/punish us. Let us live our own lives... – Tuesday
- U of C Eugene How many intelligent candidates see that and just check us off their list? – Tuesday
- cares I think this is a clear argument for a greek free campus. If we are really serious about academics and our image. – Tuesday
- Older »
- UO Public Records Office doesn't... (5)
- Investigation of how university handled rape allegations leads to more firings: No, of course I’m not talking... https://t.co/zY4rByGYnZ, 5 hours ago
- Systematic statewide abuse of Oregon public records laws thwarts the people’s right to know: That’s the headl... https://t.co/1Xny5XinPw, 22 hours ago
- UO Public Records Office doesn’t think the public has an interest in Bias Response docs?: The Foundation for ... https://t.co/qjUIx0L2bi, May 28
- RT @adamsteinbaugh: U. of Oregon: it wouldn't benefit the public to share docs showing how we respond to offensive speech. #FOIAFriday https://t.co/TnJ3d3Z2j9, May 28
- RT @uocas: .@Univ_Of_Oregon @UOPsych Marjorie Taylor's work on kids' imaginary friends featured on @NPR https://t.co/1QKKqqLUH5 https://t.co/xw1cauA2y9, May 28
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) free speech Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing Lorraine Davis March 8-9 rape allegations Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robert Berdahl Rob Mullens Scott Coltrane Senate Sharon Rudnick Students Uncategorized UO Administration UO Foundation UO Presidential Archives UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- President Schill’s investiture, 2:00-3:30 PM Wed, Matt Court 05/31/2016
- Investigation of how university handled rape allegations leads to more firings 05/31/2016
- Good news for UO budget as UC system raises tuition 05/31/2016
- Systematic statewide abuse of Oregon public records laws thwarts the people’s right to know 05/30/2016
- UO’s Jesús Sepúlveda lays out the argument that UO is losing its liberal arts focus 05/30/2016
- UO Public Records Office doesn’t think the public has an interest in Bias Response docs? 05/27/2016
- AAEO website has wrong info on reporting sexual harassment, discrimination 05/26/2016
- Today: Senate to elect new VP, awards, remarks from Pres Schill, reception 05/25/2016
- Baylor fires Ken Starr after mandatory prayer policy fails to end rapes 05/25/2016
- Shelton & Moffitt to discuss UO budget in open SBC meeting, Wed at 11 05/24/2016
- UO students mock Duck, “Go Ducks”, Sanders softball egofice, Jock Box, parking, and cheese. 05/24/2016
- Federal Court rules students should get fee-waivers for public records 05/24/2016
- UO frat boys complete weekend campout with no deaths or arrests 05/23/2016
- Prof. Freyd posts resource page on opposition to mandatory reporting policies 05/22/2016
- Civility breaks down as trash-talking Law School taunts last place Ducks 05/20/2016
- Diane Dietz reveals info on UO’s new deans and their deals 05/20/2016
- NLRB crushes administrators’ dream of mandatory civility and positive thinking 05/19/2016
- Bob Berdahl joins faculty union in endorsing Measure 28 business tax increase 05/18/2016
- Senate meeting Wed 5/18 on Mandatory Reporting 05/18/2016
- Today at 3:30 in 156 Straub: emergency Senate meeting on Mandatory Reporting 05/18/2016