Today is my last day as the interim president of the University of Oregon. I want to thank you all for the kindness and support that you have extended to me during the past seven months. Returning to Oregon and reconnecting with this fine University has been a great pleasure.
In my initial comments to the University Senate last January, I identified the four primary objectives I hoped to achieve during my brief tenure: to assist in recruiting an outstanding new leader as president of the UO, to advance the effort to secure an institutional governing board for the UO, to sustain the confidence and support for the UO among the donor community, and to help maintain the momentum the University had developed under the leadership of President Lariviere. I believe we have largely accomplished each of these goals.
With the appointment of Michael Gottfredson as its new president, the UO has secured the leadership of an extraordinarily talented and widely respected leader in higher education; we are very fortunate to have him as our new president. In the February session of the Legislature, we secured passage of a bill, supported by the governor, creating a special committee to define the process by which universities seeking institutional boards could obtain them; that special committee will be issuing its report in the next weeks and I am confident it will lead to an institutional board for the UO. During the last seven months, I have met with dozens of alumni and supporters of the University across the country, outlining for them the challenges and opportunities facing the university and encouraging their continued support in preparation for the upcoming capital campaign. Whether we have succeeded in maintaining forward momentum that had been built over the last several years will be for others to judge, but I believe the University has successfully overcome the trauma and anger that marked President Lariviere’s sudden termination.
Michael Gottfredson is assuming the presidency of an outstanding University, characterized by stellar programs, outstanding faculty, talented and dedicated staff, and excellent students. The steady erosion of state support, the consequent erosion of faculty and staff salaries and substantial increases in tuition, the growth of enrollment that has outstripped the growth of facilities or faculty – all of these will present significant challenges to the University in the future. But I am confident that, with President Gottfredson’s leadership and the support of the University community, these challenges will be overcome and the University will continue to contribute enormously to the quality of life in Oregon and the nation.
Having become an Oregonian once again, I will continue to watch the development of “my” University with much affection and pride in its achievements.
What happens over the next few years will give us more perspective on BBs achievement. It is easy complain that not all was achieved that many had [probably unreasonably] hoped. Too many remain in JH who should be removed, but the problem clearly is not just incompetence internally, but how to alter the situation extramurally. In this respect, I believe BB did a reasonable job given the contraints of time and circumstances, and we may all be grateful on that count.
But the external problems have not disappeared, and the new Prez will surely be constrained by what happened to RL; no one will want another disruptive year like the last.
UOMatters has played its role as the proverbial gadfly in this situation, and I think we can all be grateful for providing a forum to vent and to suggest policy and changes.
I would like to believe that the secrecy and arrogance that characterized the behavior of many in JH may now be put aside, but given that the cast of characters has changed more at the margin than at the core, I fear that this is not likely to happen.
Will it take an PennState like embarrassment to bring real change? Can the distance between faculty and central administration be bridged?
~Canis Minor, maybe not the brightest constellation in the heavens…
Somebody has to sling the mud…we are drowning in the shit of the JH elites and their self righteous, greedy take all for themselves administrating of this institution.
So a mudslinger it may be….and proud of it. I’m with slinging more mud.
uomatters ... made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science. – Monday
Typical OA Totally believable. After all, you are much too polite and respectful to denigrate anyone. – Monday
Dog What, aren't we already in a new dark age? Is further sinking possible? – Monday
uomatters This post was not meant to denigrate the work of OAs, without whom UO would sink into the abyss of... – Monday
Anas clypeata I see a 0.4% increase in Faculty and a 1.0% increase in the total of the remaining lines. Nice headline,... – Friday
Data So increased the number of OAs within his personal sub-unit from 7 to 16? Do we know what for? – Friday
apt too bad "last hired, first fired" doesn't apply to all these new OA positions. what's up with the growth of... – Friday
Dread OA Roberts Disclaimer: I'm one of the bloated 11%. Can someone provide more background? Is the shrinking proportion of faculty this year... – Friday
Old Gray Mare And that can be done perfectly well without the LMS. Return assignments in a timely manner and teach the class... – Friday
heraclitus That's a fair question, but it would also be good to hear an intellectual justification for _not_ using the LMS... – Thursday
curious duckling Can somebody please provide an intellectual justification for requiring the use of LMS for core ed courses? "1.3 WHEREAS Other... – Thursday
woof On the Internet, on one knows if Dog is joking. – Wednesday
oldtimer Yes, right direction. Would be nice to know details of funding. One of the sleights of administrative hand is to... – Wednesday
Dog And hey, there is actually useful info in the Senate notes, some of which should have been published here as... – Wednesday
Dog well I guess this eliminates all occupants of PLC as surviving members to give grades, I mean really, who is... – Wednesday
honest Uncle Bernie heteronormative, sexist, cis-gendered, patriarchal, trans-phobic white male privileged! Classist and racist too. You need retraining from the equity and confusion... – Friday
former squire Always knew Prof UOM was a closet sexist, er, ah, classy chivalrous gentleman. – Thursday
Sun Tzu Ah, yet another attempt to quantify faculty performance. Most of us don't remember that John Moseley, when he was our... – Tuesday
Elephant Seal good news [The UOM Editor: Your comment has been rejected because you failed to connect this good news about elephant... – Monday
St Francis Would love to read some good news honest uncle Bernie. Provide a link or two. Thanks – Monday
honest Uncle Bernie I guess UO's academic and financial status have already improved so much after several years of these guys, right? Look... – Monday
Dog about dinosaurs as teachers ... https://www.jstor.org/stable/1982016?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents students like Mary should be required to read, er I mean skim, that document – Monday
uomatters Thanks, oldtimer. Quoting from this paper, Results show that there are statistically significant and sizable differences in student achievement across... – Monday
oldtimer Evidence on new versus old blood in the classroom from a randomized experiment? Teaching experience is negatively related to student... – Monday
uomatters Thanks, this seems like a pretty balanced take on the admin mistakes that led to the financial problems, and on... – Monday
duck quills For another take, see the Quillette piece by a WSU econ instructor (written before the strike ended): https://quillette.com/2019/02/09/the-meaning-of-the-self-destructive-strike-at-wsu/ – Monday
Peter Keyes Amazon recently completed The Spheres: https://www.seattlespheres.com/explore-the-building Apple has built the gigantic "Spaceship": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoH0A4QlN6Y Facebook hired Frank Gehry for this new... – Sunday
RT @glukianoff: Oh yes, I’ve seen these policies crop up my whole career. Nice to see a heavy handed anti-#freespeech policy that i… https://t.co/r4ZVuoOolG,4 hours ago
RT @SteveDuin: Curious, Ted: In light of those concerns, why wasn't the police commissioner, or members of his staff, as motivated… https://t.co/atJWBmhIvu,Feb 16
RT @mckaydan: AG Hector Balderas is supporting two transparency bills introduced Thursday -- one of which would cover the UNM Fou… https://t.co/a6owgZiUg0,Feb 15
Dear University Community,
Today is my last day as the interim president of the University of Oregon. I want to thank you all for the kindness and support that you have extended to me during the past seven months. Returning to Oregon and reconnecting with this fine University has been a great pleasure.
In my initial comments to the University Senate last January, I identified the four primary objectives I hoped to achieve during my brief tenure: to assist in recruiting an outstanding new leader as president of the UO, to advance the effort to secure an institutional governing board for the UO, to sustain the confidence and support for the UO among the donor community, and to help maintain the momentum the University had developed under the leadership of President Lariviere. I believe we have largely accomplished each of these goals.
With the appointment of Michael Gottfredson as its new president, the UO has secured the leadership of an extraordinarily talented and widely respected leader in higher education; we are very fortunate to have him as our new president. In the February session of the Legislature, we secured passage of a bill, supported by the governor, creating a special committee to define the process by which universities seeking institutional boards could obtain them; that special committee will be issuing its report in the next weeks and I am confident it will lead to an institutional board for the UO. During the last seven months, I have met with dozens of alumni and supporters of the University across the country, outlining for them the challenges and opportunities facing the university and encouraging their continued support in preparation for the upcoming capital campaign. Whether we have succeeded in maintaining forward momentum that had been built over the last several years will be for others to judge, but I believe the University has successfully overcome the trauma and anger that marked President Lariviere’s sudden termination.
Michael Gottfredson is assuming the presidency of an outstanding University, characterized by stellar programs, outstanding faculty, talented and dedicated staff, and excellent students. The steady erosion of state support, the consequent erosion of faculty and staff salaries and substantial increases in tuition, the growth of enrollment that has outstripped the growth of facilities or faculty – all of these will present significant challenges to the University in the future. But I am confident that, with President Gottfredson’s leadership and the support of the University community, these challenges will be overcome and the University will continue to contribute enormously to the quality of life in Oregon and the nation.
Having become an Oregonian once again, I will continue to watch the development of “my” University with much affection and pride in its achievements.
Yours sincerely,
Bob Berdahl
What happens over the next few years will give us more perspective on BBs achievement. It is easy complain that not all was achieved that many had [probably unreasonably] hoped. Too many remain in JH who should be removed, but the problem clearly is not just incompetence internally, but how to alter the situation extramurally. In this respect, I believe BB did a reasonable job given the contraints of time and circumstances, and we may all be grateful on that count.
But the external problems have not disappeared, and the new Prez will surely be constrained by what happened to RL; no one will want another disruptive year like the last.
UOMatters has played its role as the proverbial gadfly in this situation, and I think we can all be grateful for providing a forum to vent and to suggest policy and changes.
I would like to believe that the secrecy and arrogance that characterized the behavior of many in JH may now be put aside, but given that the cast of characters has changed more at the margin than at the core, I fear that this is not likely to happen.
Will it take an PennState like embarrassment to bring real change? Can the distance between faculty and central administration be bridged?
~Canis Minor, maybe not the brightest constellation in the heavens…
I’m a muckraker, not a gadfly.
Dog says
I never know what the phrase “real change” actually means.
For me, I want to see better scaling between academic infrastructure
and our enrollment.
Here is a prediction, that I hope I am wrong about: The UO will start to
outscore some of its learning/ways to gain credit/courses …
Finally, if “real change” means restore trust – then I agree that would
be significant
You are more of a mudslinger than a muckraker.
Somebody has to sling the mud…we are drowning in the shit of the JH elites and their self righteous, greedy take all for themselves administrating of this institution.
So a mudslinger it may be….and proud of it. I’m with slinging more mud.
We should all thank President Berdahl for convincing the faculty to unionize. This will certainly be his most enduring acheivement at UO.