Press "Enter" to skip to content

Legislator not impressed by Coltrane’s speech, wants law on confidentiality

Rich Read has the story in the Oregonian here, worth reading it all.

2 Comments

  1. UO Grad Student 04/11/2015

    “Late Friday, Klinger emailed a statement saying the university is in “full support” of Gelser’s efforts.

    “It is critical that students have a clear understanding of confidentiality laws when receiving services from any provider,” Tobin wrote.”

    So, why does it take an act of state congress to make it so? Their hands are tied by overly permissive/ambiguous law? Ridiculous.

    • just different 04/11/2015

      Plus, a great way to make sure 18-year-olds who can’t seem to read a syllabus are well-informed about their legal rights is by quietly making a few changes to the wording on the counseling center website. I’m sure the “court order” vs. “subpoena” issue really stood out for them.

      I wish these people would get their story straight. It’s exhausting keeping track of all this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *