10/30/2016 update: Long story after the break, which I suppose is a good thing for those that bill by the hour.
The latest is that the judge has given UO’s hired lawyers an extension from 10/28 until 12/2 to respond to the players lawyers’ response to the judge’s response to the UO lawyers’ request for dismissal, as well as an extension to respond to the players lawyers’ 3rd complaint, which of course was amended in response to the UO lawyers’ response to the players lawyer’s 2nd complaint. In case that’s not perfectly clear, here’s a free link to the docket, from the freelaw.org hack of the federal court’s paywalled database. Oh, wait, there are two dockets – maybe the links you want are here.
10/11/2016: Dana Altman’s players refile discrimination complaint against Gottfredson, UO
Tran Nguyen has the scoop in the Daily Emerald, here:
The players’ attorneys now have sworn affidavits alleging a pattern of gender discrimination by the UO administration against males accused of sexual assault, from the attorneys who defended the players and others.
Docket here, motion to reconsider here, amended complaint and affidavits here:
…
The motion to reconsider is also interesting, more on that soon.
So a lawyer employed by the University is filing a lawsuit against the University?
No, she’s employed by ASUO to defend students, and she’s supporting the lawsuit with an affidavit, not filing it.
Rule 1. Don’t misspell you client’s name on the court filing.
Damyean DOTSON. Not Dobson.