Roger Thompson’s $5M recruiting expenditure increase pays off with $6M in freshman

This is good news – so good that I’ll forgive Around the O for this puff piece, which omits any mention of costs:

The University of Oregon’s entering class for fall 2019 is the most diverse and academically prepared in the history of the university, and there are a record number of them.

“This is the equivalent of winning a national championship for us,” said Roger Thompson, vice president for student services and enrollment management. “Conventional wisdom says that universities can’t grow without sacrificing some of the qualities we value in our students, but the UO tends not to abide by convention. We broke records across the board at an institution that’s been around since 1876. It’s truly remarkable.”

Preliminary figures indicate the first day of classes brought 4,558 first-year students to campus, beating the previous record by more than 300 students and representing growth of 8.5 percent over last year.

This year marks the ninth in a row that the UO has set a new record for the diversity of its entering class from a race and ethnicity standpoint. The number of first-year students identifying as domestic minorities is 1,573, up from 1,518 in 2018.

The freshman class also established several records for academic achievements:

    • Highest high school grade point average of 3.65, compared to 3.59 last year and the previous UO record of 3.61.
    • Highest SAT scores ever recorded at the UO, with an average of 1200, compared to last year’s 1191.
    • Most college credits earned, bringing in 62,209 credits from Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate or dual credit programs. This represents 54 percent of all first-year students entering with pre-earned credits.

“Everyone on campus shares the credit for this success,” Thompson said. “Whether you came to a scholarship dinner, served food at Duck Days, or simply helped a visitor find the EMU, you had a hand in making the UO feel like home for prospective students.”

So what is the cost?

Assuming this is the typical mix of in and out of state students, we’re spending $5M more per year to bring in about 300 additional students per year, averaging about $20K each in net tuition, or ~$6M a year gross. Let’s call it $1M net, before we spend a dime on teaching them anything.

And this is the first year these investments have paid off. Thompson needs to repeat this performance, without spending any more money. He’s got a tough job.

Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Roger Thompson’s $5M recruiting expenditure increase pays off with $6M in freshman

  1. charlie says:

    What’s the financial aid these incoming freshmen are receiving? It would make a difference if scholarships and grants the first year, are replaced by loans in subsequent years.

  2. Inquiring Minds says:

    Questions on your methodology for calculating that the $5 Million investment resulted in a $6million return. (caveat, absolutely great that we have a large, diverse class so not critical of that at all).
    — Is that $6 million for the entire class? So then the net is $1 million? how many would have come without the $5 million increase in recruitment?
    — Does this somehow account for the fact that we also have increasing number of students who are Pathways students? Again, its wonderful to offer this to students. But I think (?) it also means we have reduced tuition as funding for these students comes from some combination of foundation donors and perhaps subsidies from other students or sources.

  3. thedude says:

    Other considerations

    Housing – revenue in first year or two and none after generally
    Counterfactuals – This generates more students and credit hours than spending on football, basketball, gyms, or TV ads. Just think how much better off we would have been had we not spent $20m on branding 5 years ago and gotten nothing.

    Generally a 20 percent net return is pretty dang good.

  4. Barry says:

    I may be missing something here. Is the $20,000 one year net tuition per student? If so, that $6M is just the first-year revenue. Factoring in retention rates, over 4 years, the revenue would be closer to $20M.

    • uomatters says:

      Integrate over the expenditure and enrollment changes and retention. Do the present value or not, it doesn’t matter, the marginal return is negative.

      Of course this is too simplistic and I am not arguing that this is a worse investment than, say, the law school subsidies, or the Provost’s Jock Box, or President Schill’s skybox, or the $2M or so the academic side is paying for the utility tunnels and electricity to light up Phil’s Phallus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.