Government Relations Office sends out update on 2018 legislative session

That would be OSU’s Government Relations Office. Sure it’s only October, and the session is 3 months away, but the early bird gets the worm:

From: “Mills, Jock”

Subject: [Government_Relations_Update] OSU Government Relations Update — Looking to the 2018 Legislative Session and Beyond

Date: October 30, 2017 at 4:41:46 PM PDT Continue reading

John Canzano on how big-time college sports corrupts everything

In the Oregonian, here, with a link to his previous investigative reports on the alleged 1998 gang rape by members of the OSU football team:

… The Benton County District Attorney’s office and the blossoming enterprise that was the Beavers’ athletic department had a close working relationship, according to Sandrock. The Beavers held an annual meeting designed to foster good will.

Over the years, Sandrock said, he and other investigators were summoned to a meeting with Oregon State administrators during the tenures of football coaches Mike Riley, Joe Avezzano, Jerry Pettibone and Dave Kragthorpe. Present for those meetings were upper-level administrators including athletic directors Dee Andros and, later, Mitch Barnhardt. The meetings were presided over by one of the OSU vice presidents and occasionally by the university president, according to Sandrock.

On Oregon State’s annual guest list: the district attorney’s office, Corvallis Police Department, Benton County Sheriff’s Department, Oregon State Police and campus police.

“We’d get together and slap backs, laugh and talk about how we were going to try to work better together,” Sandrock said. “We had one season where 10 or 11 of the starting 22 football players ended up under investigation for one crime or another. Finally, one year I stood up at the meeting and said, ‘If I catch your assistant coaches contacting a sex-assault victim involving one of your players again I’ll have the coach arrested.'”

The room went silent.

Prior to 1998, Sandrock said, he became aware that Oregon State assistant football coaches attempted to talk survivors out of pursuing cases. The practice happened more than once, according to Sandrock, and not just with sex assaults.

“It just seemed to be part of the culture that coaches would do what they could to get their athletes out of trouble,” he said. …

Meanwhile Austin Meek has a story in the RG (prompted by the departure of Jim Bartko for the AD’s job at Fresno State) about the 1996 decision by UO boosters to go big on college football:

… The enduring contribution, though, was his relationship with Oregon’s biggest benefactor. It started in the 1990s, when Bartko was working in Oregon’s Portland development office and Knight was taking a renewed interest in his alma mater.

“After the Rose Bowl, he started getting involved,” Bartko said. “I just happened to be his contact. We became great friends.

“He had a vision for the University of Oregon to be great. He thought athletics could be a great window to the whole campus and elevate everybody.”

When Bartko leaves, he’ll take his own piece of Oregon history. He was one of the people at the table when three influential boosters — Knight, Pat Kilkenny and Randy Papé — gathered with Bellotti after the 1994 Cotton Bowl to chart the future of Oregon athletics.

Apparently the faculty were not consulted, though presumably some of the Johnson Hall administrators, who were along for their free junkets, were in on the deal.

President, Senate cooperate to transparently work with new board

From our Corvallis branch office:

Outgoing Senate President Kevin Gable spoke eloquently about the role of Faculty Senate in a shared governance setting. That would be at Oregon State University: 
http://media.oregonstate.edu/media/OSU+Faculty+Senate+January+9%2C+2014+part+1+of+7/0_tkg0wb61

Nice little profile in the Gazette-Times, as well: http://www.gazettetimes.com/news/local/osu-faculty-senate-president-kevin-gable-notes-importance-of-shared/article_d7d0d012-7a74-11e3-ba4f-0019bb2963f4.html

Then Gable ticks off the pieces of the OSU puzzle in which the Senate wields significant influence: curriculum, academic regulations, the criteria for promotions and tenure. Gable also noted the Senate’s role in the establishment of OSU’s new Board of Trustees.

“I’m extremely happy with the process we went through. It was a showcase of shared governance. The Senate specifically and the faculty broadly participated in the decision-making process. And that’s where our interest lies.”

Here at UO, the Senate has not yet heard much about the UO board of trustees. We were not told we could attend their first meeting. A second meeting, apparently to approve their by-laws is coming soon. There are no draft by-laws on the UO Trustees website, and there is no notice of meeting either.

University hires new VP for Finance and Administration for $236K

5/4/2013: The university has successfully concluded an open national search for a new VP for Finance and Administration. The president reports to the faculty:

“Our former VPFA did an exemplary job of helping keeping the university on a sound financial footing in a difficult economic environment and doing so in a most transparent manner. Our new VPFA has the experience and vision to continue that success as the university moves forward.”

 The salary is a substantial $236K:

But the new hire has many years of experience as VPFA at smaller universities, and $236K seems to be the competitive wage for a university with 25,000 students and a research budget of $160M a year. Plus, the university is not taking much risk with a one year contract, and must pay accordingly.

Oh wait. Sorry. The above is the deal for OSU’s new VPFA, Glenn Ford. Here at UO, our VPFA is Jamie Moffitt, and we pay her $270K. 

She was hired in 2012 after a failed search for an outside candidate. She was on the search committee that rejected the other applicants – no conflict of interest there! Her previous financial experience seems to consist of a few years managing the budget for the UO law school, and then 18 months or so doing the same for the UO athletic department. During which time she proved her loyalty by hiding the details of the strange and expensive deals between Dave Frohnmayer and Duck booster Pat Kilkenny, whom he had appointed athletic director. Pretty risky to appoint an outsider who might not understand the benefits of “The Oregon Way”. And she’s proving her loyalty again, by hiding UO’s budget projections from the UO faculty:

Beavs sweep Ducks on public records access

5/28/2012: Back in November the RG editors criticized President Lariviere for the raises that brought down the Governor’s wrath, noting that fully 40% of the money was going to administrators:

“Bad Politics, Good Policy: The UO invests its tuition money in (some) people”

… The documents list “special equity raises” of $3.1 million for 743 faculty members and $1.8 million for 417 administrators. The faculty raises averaged 6.98 percent; administrators’ increases averaged 7.68 percent. …

How did the administration go about justifying raises for each other and benefits like cars and family Rose Bowl trips? The documents and thin rationalizations are here.

It took Nathan Tublitz more than three months to get this info via the public records process. Initially UO told him he’d have to pay $4,328.63 to see the records for all administrators. Tublitz narrowed his request to a few top administrators. Even after that it took more than a month, many emails, and a meeting of the Senate Transparency Committee to get UO to release this information.

Some faculty at Oregon State tried to get the same info for some of their top administrators, who also got some hefty raises. They sent the OSU public records officer an email, got a $35 estimate (should have asked for a fee waiver, this should be a slam dunk with their DA) and a week later they had the documents. Full dump here, warning 9MB file.

It’s the coverup that destroys trust. In a few short months Bob Berdahl has managed to do some major damage to the improvements in public records transparency initiated by Lariviere. It’s shameful. But I hadn’t realized we were this far behind.

President gives pay raises, keeps job.

12/14/2011. That would be OSU President Ed Ray. From the Corvallis Gazette Times:

OSU will, however, raise its faculty pay by 4 percent starting in January 2012, as a means of keeping good faculty and attracting top-notch new faculty members. The faculty also will receive pay raises in January 2013.

Thursday’s announcement about the faculty raises comes a month after news broke that University of Oregon faculty and administrative workers received on average $4,845 in raises last spring.

Along with raises, the university plans hire 40 to 57 more faculty members over the next year, including 15 to 17 to teach sections of courses with heavy undergraduate enrollment. And just like students, OSU hopes to hire the best faculty they can.

Congratulations to the OSU faculty. I’m no economist, but these raises look very similar to the ones that Chancellor Pernsteiner and Governor Kitzhaber used as part of their justification for firing Richard Lariviere. I wonder if board member and OSU professor Lynda Ciuffetti gets one? Maybe President Ray is getting away with this because he’s not passing out sabbaticals and BMW’s to his top administrators?

OSU, OUS will spare no buzzword:

8/10/2011:  OUS had a whole meeting devoted to
Equity and Diversity last month. I challenge you to read the docket and come away with
any sense for what they will actually do to address the real problems of college access for low SES Oregonians. OUS will do nothing, except for have more meetings, appoint a task force, blather on, and piss away student tuition money on themselves and some consultants.

Meanwhile, a friend from OSU passes along the announcement below. Not a word as to what will actually be done, but that’s not really the point with these sorts of administrative positions, is it? What counts is to use every buzzword. But he left out sustainability – he would never get an administrative job at UO.

Dear colleagues,

As outlined in a statement made by President Ray on May 31, 2011, I was asked to assume the role of Interim Executive Director of Equity and Inclusion with responsibility over the Offices of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity, Community and Diversity, and Women’s Advancement and Gender Equity effective July 1, 2011.  Part of this new role involves envisioning a more holistic and cohesive approach to the work of equity, inclusion, and diversity.  As efforts to design and implement an integrated agenda that encompasses what were three separate agendas continue, my intent, and the desire of staff members in these offices, is to be collaborative in shaping that agenda and to be transparent, keeping members of the university community well-informed.  To learn about details as they develop, please visit the Equity and Inclusion website: http://oregonstate.edu/oei

Sincerely,

Angelo Gomez, Interim Executive Director
Office of Equity and Inclusion
526 Kerr Administration
Oregon State University
Phone: 541-737-3556 

Transparent? His office won’t even post OSU’s affirmative action plan.

OSU

5/4/2010: Lots of OSU visitors lately. Sorry, we got nothing for you, just UO stuff. Get your own blog! Wait, here’s a copy of the OSU Affirmative Action plan. Your Associate General Counsel Charles E. Fletcher tried to sell this to us, and said he didn’t want it posted online. We got it free, and here it is. Sorry Mr. Fletcher, you just don’t understand our business model. FWIW, it’s a much more professional job than the UO AA Plan and from what I can tell your AA budget is about half what Penny Daugherty charges UO. Let’s not even mention UO’s Vice President for Diversity Charles Martinez and his budget – it’s a crime. You should be proud. Go Beavers.

Hmm

4/9/2010: From KVAL:

A new study found Oregon State University women are paid more for their eggs than women at the University of Oregon.

To find intelligent young women, fertility clinics often advertise in college newspapers. Georgia Tech studied those ads at 306 schools and found that Oregon State University women were offered $5,000 for their eggs while women at the University of Oregon were offered a thousand dollars less. … 

But some questioned the ethics. “It’s an undue inducement for a poor student and it begins to really commodify the process,” said Dr. Susan Tolle who heads the Center for Ethics in Health Care at Oregon Health and Science University. …

So, it’s more ethical to pay poor students less. Very interesting.