Press "Enter" to skip to content

"A random mention on an internet forum

led investigators to look into the question of a Penn State cover-up in the Sandusky case.” From the latest NYT story.

3 Comments

  1. Anonymous 11/18/2011

    Good article. For all you campus cop haters, pay close attention to page 2 and what they say about PSUPD. Note – I’m speaking of the criminal side of things, not how PSU administration chooses to administratively discipline their OAs.

    “…they [Investigators for the attorney general’s office] came to believe that the campus police officers had truly wanted to make a case against Sandusky… The officers had gone so far as to set up a sting operation in which the boy’s mother called the coach, and, with the police listening in, confronted Sandusky.”

    “Ultimately, the district attorney decided against taking the case to trial, a decision that, years later, the attorney general’s investigators could well understand.”

  2. UO Matters 11/18/2011

    For the record, UO Matters doesn’t hate cops, campus or otherwise. I don’t hate anyone who does a tough job. I just think the university has better uses for the $1 million a year the conversion is costing, and I’m tired of being lied to about the situation.

  3. Anonymous 11/18/2011

    Ditto UOMatters! and

    I’d like to add, we are tired of the lack of transparency and tired of having things like this shoved down our throats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *