7/7/2011: The RG has a good editorial on the ORI building:
ORI could have been in its new building already, and the UO could have netted one-third more income from the lease, if the UO hadn’t insisted there was no suitable alternative to the riverfront site.
Simple enough. But do you think Johnson Hall learned anything from this? No. They are currently trying to hide public records on the Gabon agreement, athletic spending, sweetheart retirement contracts for admins, the new Diversity VP position, and the current status of UO’s Affirmative Action Plan.
What’s the RG’s gripe with Lariviere? Why didn’t the RG write editorials like this back when Frohnmayer and Moseley were selling UO down the river?