Affirmative Action finally tells students where they can report sexual harassment

7/13/2016 update: Reporter Max Thornberry has the report in the Daily Emerald here. A snippet:

Concerns about the timeliness and effectiveness of the AAEO office [aren’t] new. A 2014 report from the ombuds office found that, “classified staff report high levels of distrust…in the fairness, competence and responsiveness of the University’s AA/EO function.”

The ombuds office did not investigate the office itself and only makes notes of patterns of perception, according to the report. Former ombudsman Bruce McAllister did note however that, “perception does not necessarily equate to fact, but patterns are important to the acceptance and long-term efficacy of any particular program.”

Until site reconstruction this week, there was no mention at all of the ombuds office, an integral piece in the murky mandatory reporting debate on college campuses. The ombuds office is one of the few truly confidential outlets for survivors of sexual assault, which is a key part of the debate surrounding mandatory reporting.

6/29/2016 update: Penny Daugherty’s AAEO website finally has been updated with a link to the correct administrator for reporting child abuse. But the link for reporting discrimination and sexual harassment still takes you to a pdf (below) that is years out of date and does not mention the new Title IX Coordinator, Office of Crisis Intervention, etc. Other AAEO pages and links also still describe procedures that are years out of date, and policies that are no longer in effect.

That’s right, the UO office that is responsible for complying with federal laws on discrimination and harassment can’t even point UO students, faculty, and staff to the current UO procedures and policies for complying with those laws. Does anyone except Johnson Hall still have confidence in AAEO Director Penny Daugherty?

6/23/2016 update: Four weeks after I emailed her about it Affirmative Action Director Penny Daugherty’s website still has incorrect info about reporting sexual assault and harassment. Need to report child abuse? Her office will refer you to someone who no longer works at UO.

5/26/2016: AAEO website rife with errors & outdated info for reporting sexual abuse, harassment, assaults

At this point no one should be surprised by the continued incompetence of AAEO Director Penny Daugherty. President Schill’s emergency policy requiring mandatory reporting has been in effect since February 18th. Full policy here. The gist:

Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 11.40.05 AM

The UO Senate’s SGBV committee has worked for 6 months to develop a permanent version of this policy. The Senate has had three very public debates on the question of mandatory reporting to Ms Daugherty’s  office. It’s been all over the papers. And yet Ms Daugherty’s AAEO website still manages to get the basics all wrong:

 Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 11.52.10 AM

Ms Daugherty’s AAEO office says:

Consistent with its commitment to provide a safe environment for students, faculty and staff, University policy requires that employees who have credible evidence that prohibited discrimination is occurring have a duty to report that information to their supervisor or to the Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity.

That’s not true.  Since February, UO policy has said that students should go to the Title IX coordinator or the Office of Crisis Intervention, and not to Ms Daugherty.  Why was this job taken away from her? I don’t know. There have been two external reviews of AAEO in the past year, but UO’s General Counsel will not make them public.

AAEO’s website also says:

Confidentiality for all parties is respected to the extent possible.

That’s deceptive. AAEO’s ability to respect confidentiality is quite limited, and in fact AAEO’s responsibility is to protect the university, not the victims. Here’s the language from the proposed new policy, which was approved by the General Counsel’s office:

Employees should be aware that AAEO is tasked with ensuring compliance with this policy and state and federal law. Therefore, while AAEO will work with employees, students and campus community members to ensure that they understand their complaint options, are protected from retaliation and are provided with interim measures as appropriate, AAEO employees are not advocates for individuals participating in the process.

The UO Ombuds Office is one place that can really guarantee confidentiality. AAEO doesn’t even mention them. And if you follow the prominent links on the AAEO website, the incorrect information just gets worse:

For more information regarding university employee required reporting obligations, including those related to the reporting of child abuse and crimes under the Clery Campus Security Act, please see Summary of Required UO Employee Reporting Responsibilities.

Really. That link starts with this:

Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 11.59.55 AM

That information is obsolete, wrong, and dangerous. The document is from January 2014, two years before the current emergency policy was put in place. It’s incorrect about where to report sexual harassment directed at students. Do you need to report child abuse? Our Office of AAEO will send you to the email address of someone who no longer works at UO.

OK, maybe the prominent link on the AAEO homepage to this glossy brochure will lead to better information? No, that brochure is also years out of date. As in five:

Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 12.10.11 PM

OK, try AAEO’s tab for Sexual Harassment and Assault. This will take you to a different version of the AAEO brochure, with different information. Different, but also wrong. As one example, AAEO says that if you have a “facilitated conversation” with them, “the participants retain control over the outcome”:

Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 5.03.55 PM

No they don’t. AAEO employees are mandatory reporters. So suppose two faculty come to AAEO for a facilitated conversation to talk about some issues in their department. During the conversation, the AAEO facilitator decides that these issues include credible evidence of sexual harassment. Under current UO policy the facilitator would be obligated to report, and perhaps initiate a formal grievance process. This process could easily lead to the alleged harasser learning the identity of the people who had come to AAEO, to have what they had thought would be a conversation in which they could “retain control over the outcome.”

This isn’t just my interpretation, it’s the interpretation of one of AAEO’s own facilitators, who agreed that in this sort of situation it would be better to go to the Ombuds office. So why won’t AAEO say that publicly? I don’t think it’s a conspiracy. It’s just incompetence. Many long years of it.

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Affirmative Action finally tells students where they can report sexual harassment

  1. Thought I was anonymous says:

    Providing factually incorrect information to sexual assault survivors goes way, way beyond incompetence. Thanks for posting this.

  2. Anonymous says:

    She has been here a long time & knows lots of secrets.

    • Anonymous says:

      Dirt on people going back to the Frohnmayer era. Think J. Edgar. If she ever leaves it’s going to be on her terms.

  3. Penny Has to Go says:

    Why am I not surprised that the perpetually uninformed Penny Daugherty has failed to notice that, unlike her AAEO website, UO’s Human Resources office has long ago updated that same document (Summary of Required UO Employee Reporting Responsibilities) with at least a new contact person. . The latest version has the internal date of Dec. 23, 2015 – more than 5 months ago.

    But even that newer document from HR gives no links for the real places for reporting in the “where to report” box — UO Police, other police, or the State. How difficult would that be to include links and phone numbers?

    Considering that failure to report abuse of a child (including any UO student under 18 who is not married) is subject to prosecution of a Class A violation of the law, which can result in the imposition of a substantial fine, you would think that UO would make it easy to do this.

  4. Zero Tolerance For Incompetence says:

    What’s it gonna take for people to realize the VPFA is the root of all this incompetence and chaos. Look at her portfolio of failures. At least the last shift in her org chart aligned someone else under her to clean things up. Why keep the nincompoop? It’s asinine to continue to allow this unqualified individual to drive this public institution into the ground. She has had such a negative impact on people’s lives, careers, and emotional wellbeing, not to mention the budget. The University deserves better leadership.

    • Dog says:

      And most of these same comments/charges were leveled against the previous VPFA. So I would say our tolerance is quite a bit higher than ZERO, perhaps approaching Infinity …

  5. motheaten says:

    I’ve had to go through an ugly review, and I know others who have had to be a part of drawn-out nonsensical inquiries. I want to say, in some hope that UO Matters is not a private club – in my experience, Penny Daugherty was thorough and fair, not fooled and not foolhardy. I’ve been worried about this three-year-old thread of antipathy towards Penny Daugherty. Does nobody understand that she is constantly being used by JH? She’s not incompetent. She’s a woman hired to take all the backwash – her job literally is to cover. To say she is “incompetent” is to misunderstand how she is used.

    • uomatters says:

      Do you have particular examples of how she is being used by JH, and of what she is covering for?

      • anonymous says:

        Her job, and the job of anyone else in AA, is to make sure there are no “findings” against faculty, higher-up managers, and student athletes. Others may be thrown under the bus.