From the RG’s Jordyn Brown, here.
NOTE: Thumbs up/down on comments has been disabled due to misuse by PR Flack supporters. Sorry!
- test (7)
- UO Matters { Yes, an Android would work, wouldn't it? If you see a driverless Tesla headed towards you remember that you can't... }
- I Robot { Right, on my office computer -- not in Johnson unit btw -- it doesn't accept my humanity -- but on... }
- UO Matters { Are you posting from a Johnson Hall IP address? I've had some nutty moments from there and I can see... }
- I Robot { Esteemed Colleague Bill: Yes, the software is cancelling your faithful correspondent but only when he comments via UO network. I... }
- Fishwrapper { It already has. }
- UO Matters { My spam filter does not believe you are human? I have the feeling this AI thing is going to end... }
- I Robot { test indeed. I can't submit comments from my office computer. UOM won't take my word for it that I'm human.... }
- Interim Provost Woodruff-Borden announces another... (10)
- thedude { It can be more than 3 percent, only if someone else gets a raise lower than that. The only people... }
- UO Matters { Welcome to the University of Oregon, and yes it is. }
- { I haven't been here very long-- does this mean that for OAs, we don't get a COLA increase, but just... }
- Fishwrapper { That's what I've heard... }
- UO Matters { If you make up something and say it to yourself is that the same as hearing it? }
- { And Johnson Hall is pleased and excited to announce that they have given leave for the sun to rise tomorrow.... }
- Thedude { Rumors I've heard is that the union is getting ready to roll over again and it isn't even going to... }
- Fishwrapper { How about the low-hanging, obvious, and totally sophomoric fruit: Kevin Bacon's First Film Role? }
- The Administration wants you to... (3)
- honest Uncle Bernie { UOM: If so, not wise of you. If there is a principled statement here, and the principals want to be... }
- UO Matters { They said I could post the names. I didn't because I want to attract more readers with the mystery of... }
- Fair Questions { Why redact the names? If they feel this strongly why is that a secret? }
- UO closes new dorm due... (9)
- Darby { Not long after opening, the first floor water fountain had been leaking causing major damage to the very expensive flooring... }
- Mike { Crappy concrete, crappy inspection...GO DUX! }
- John Q { Public records requests for the city of Eugene inspections / approvals of these construction projects? }
- honest Uncle Gangsta { Yes, the Harbaugh Institute for Advanced Study is planned for the Inner Courtyard. We all await this glorious culmination of... }
- Fishwrapper { It wasn't built for indoor T&F events, so what's the complaint? }
- Townie { Hayward Field does not offer adequate rain cover. Poor execution. }
- UO Matters { Agreed. I know from family connections predating my time at UO that Mr. Knight has long had a taste for... }
- honest Uncle Gangsta { Maybe they should subcontract the dorm projects to Good Old Uncle Phil (GOUP). Say what you will, he gets the... }
- NYT lauds deposed dictator &... (20)
- honest Uncle Gangsta { A sportsmanlike encounter today of our magnificent Ducks with stately Portland State. A gentlemanly send off, I take it. We... }
- honest Uncle Gangsta { A deeply moving saga. This man has enriched us all. Starting with himself. His influence on this great University is... }
- University to deduct regressive "contributions"... (11)
- UO Matters { Surely the payouts are in proportion to the mandatory "contributions". }
- Anas clypeata { So if you make $48,000 a year, you pay $480 per year, or 1% of your income. (Technically, the UO... }
- I, Robot { uom does not seem to take material from my computer. It asks me to check a box affirming that I... }
- thedude { They could have split even like social security, medicare, other payroll taxes. They intentionally stuck us with more of it... }
- UO Matters { Thanks for the link, which states "Employers can choose to pay the employee portion, in full or in part, as... }
- SkitterFootedScarab { Is that an option for large employers? Like PERS match? https://paidleave.oregon.gov/resources/common-questions.html#:~:text=The%20Oregon%20Employment%20Department%20decides,rate%20for%202023%20is%201%25. The 60% employee contribution is State mandated but the... }
- UO Matters { State law requires UO to have this program (or use the state plan), but it does not require UO to... }
- Inquiring minds { I am perplexed by your discontent directed at UO. This is a state law. Most employees in Oregon have been... }
- Will UO's new fundraising VP... (8)
- Fishwrapper { Fair enough. }
- honest Uncle Bernie { Fish -- at least perhaps we can agree on your last paragraph. }
- Fishwrapper { hUB, I sense a bit of snarcasm there...I see what you're doing. _ The process of driving an institution of... }
- honest Uncle Bernie { Fish -- why the snark about Phil? l would say that both UO and the state of Oregon failed to... }
- Older »
- test (7)
Last Tweets
Tags
AAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Coronavirus Dana Altman Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Diversity Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) free speech Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing Lorraine Davis March 8-9 rape allegations Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Rob Mullens Scott Coltrane Senate Sharon Rudnick Tim Gleason Track and Field Championships Uncategorized UO Foundation UO Presidential Archives UO restructuring plan UO Trustees-
Recent Posts
- test 09/14/2023
- The Administration wants you to scab on your grad students 09/11/2023
- Interim Provost Woodruff-Borden announces another pay cut 09/07/2023
- NYT lauds deposed dictator & one-time UO ally Ali Bongo as a musician & environmentalist 08/31/2023
- UO closes new dorm due to crack problem 08/25/2023
- University to deduct regressive “contributions” for new paid leave program 08/16/2023
- Will UO’s new fundraising VP Joe Buck compete with the Ducks? 08/14/2023
- Seem familiar? 08/10/2023
- Does he believe this crap? Does he think anyone does? 08/07/2023
- UO not quite at bottom of Big 10/18! 08/04/2023
- UO Trustees hold emergency meeting to discuss academic issues 08/04/2023
- New Prez Karl Scholz’s first act will be to raise GTFF and faculty pay to national norms! 07/25/2023
- Ingrate Beach Volleyball players want to take the bread from the mouths of AD Rob Mullens’s wife and kids 07/22/2023
- UO’s administrators spend millions on PR flacks and Around the O to puff up their careers, and the only journalists left to find out what’s really happening are the students at the Daily Emerald 07/19/2023
- Here’s hoping Tim Inman gave Karl Scholz more transition info than this pablum I just paid Kevin Reed $364.54 for 07/12/2023
- GC Kevin Reed’s PR Office uses fees and delays to stymie access to Pres Scholz’s transition docs 07/11/2023
- Pres Schill gives big-time college football coach slap on the wrist for tolerating sexual abuse 07/08/2023
- No one at UO gives a shit about Intercollegiate Track and Field, so Hayward tickets are now free: 07/05/2023
- Hearty “Go Ducks” from new UO Pres Karl Scholz: 07/03/2023
- ChatGPT or UO’s Interim Leaders on UO’s commitment to diversity? You decide: 06/29/2023
Blogroll
Polls
Loading ...Spam Blocked
Thanks for the tip, now I need to intercept more of that cheese before the greedy “labor” gets any.
Who will represent faculty interests? ?
Some economist. We’re screwed.
UO has long been at or near the bottom among the Oregon campuses in state funding per student. This, for the “flagship.” Some flagship! Pathetic.
There may be other states like this, but I’ll bet not many. Maybe Colorado.
Here’s hoping that the UO admin can do something about this grossly inequitable situation.
If our local legislators have ever tried to do anything about this, it has escaped my attention.
Many at OSU consider their school the “Flagship” what ever that means.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AOregon_State_University
As stated below. Blame your board. I do not know, perhaps some old timer can shed some light, but I think I heard that the old OUS model of funding following the student was proposed/desired by UO as they were the largest school at the time. They just failed to see the pie on the table or the possibilities of PSU enrollment bloat or that OSU may have a product that the customer would want, beyond 4H. Add in that UO turned its back on in-state students since as a side effect of that same bad model, out of state students could at times be worth more than Oregonians. Too bad that international students got spooked but hey they may be back after 2020^.
My recollections are that Myles brand negotiated retention of tuition funds by campuses, not because UO was larger, but because we had many more high paying non residents. The old OUS Board then began distributing state support for resident students based on national costs of different majors. oSU won big in two ways. First by getting more per resident because of their engineering programs and second by getting paid that higher amount for each additional resident student, even if the student majors in the cheapest major on their campus. Finally, there is the cascades campus thinning of the soup. Just my recollections
I thought having an independent Board was supposed to unleash untapped funding sources so that the University wouldn’t have to be dependent on State funding, which OSU seems to compete for with more success. The Board was also empowered to create STEM programs that would be popular to in-state students.
What happened?
Too busy finding more ways to pay more administrators more.
Oh, and Duck gear.
The Hat’s notion of independence was premised on UO’s issuance of approximately $1 billion in bonds. Instead of having public oversight, the school was going to answer to Wall Street bond palaces. The idea that debt would create the capacity for the flagship to do what it wanted was an hallucination, and nothing more than a PR marketing scheme…
That is a ridiculous account of the UO/Phil Knight endowment plan, the issuing of bonds, how the finances would work.
It could be both “ridiculous” and essentially true.
The Senate Budget Committee Report of November 8, 2010, contained a simplified explanation of the proposed funding mechanism:
“The financial strategy proposed is for the State to “capitalize its investment in the University of Oregon.” Under the proposal, the level of the current annual State general fund support for the University, approximately $62 million, would be locked in for the next 30 years. (This is a nominal dollar amount, and would presumably decline in real (inflation-adjusted) value, and as a percentage of the State budget, over that 30 years.) The State would issue bonds for an amount that could be supported by an annual payment of $62 million, approximately $800 million. Before the State committed any bond funding, the University would raise a matching amount from donors, and this combined $1.6 billion would constitute a greatly expanded endowment for the University. The income from this endowment would support University operations, in lieu of the annual support from the State general fund. The State would make payments on the bonds for 30 years, and would not be responsible for any other support of the University of Oregon.”
An excellent summary of “the plan” that the Hat and Phil Knight had proposed. If the money had been invested in a stock index fund at about the time mentioned, then after subtracting out the returns needed to substitute for the state subsidy, the endowment would be worth around $2 billion today. (This would be in addition to the current UO endowment).
One more question. I once heard it was typical and chronic for state departments and municipalities to not pay into PERS in the past… even for the variable accounts. Anyone know if this is true (link).
Did UO pay enough (anything) into PERS when it hired coaches that earned outside monies deemed pay (same for OHSU and physicians)?
https://expo.oregonlive.com/news/g66l-2019/06/48899ada085375/top-20-oregon-pers-recipients-as-of-jan-1-2019.html
Everyone pays – but UO pulled a scam with Mike Bellotti by not paying PERS on the money they passed-through to him from Nike, even though it counted for calculating his final salary and his $500K a year PERS benefits. Ted Sickinger at the Oregonian wrote some great stories about how they pulled this off – including a well-time quickie divorce and remarriage.
a much bigger problem than these was the financial malpractice of PERS and the legislature in handling the variable accounts. The earnings on variable accounts far exceeded the earnings on Pers investment accounts. pERS and the legislature should have recognized this problem and limited payouts to variable accounts to the earnings on a separate portfolio matching the portfolio used for earnings on variable returns. failure to do so meant obligations on the higher returning variable account assets far exceeded far exceeded the earnings on the person assets. This is a decades old overhang on the system, but it was caused by the system not the recipients.
You’ve said that before, I’ve looked at the news source from Sickinger that supposedly says that. It says no such thing. It was bullshit then what you were saying, and it’s bullshit now. The idea that UO could skirt the PERS contributions laws is just ridiculous.
I’ve talked with Sickinger about it. UO did not pay PERS contributions for Bellotti’s Nike money, but that money was used to calculate his final salary and payout.
If you and Ted really have evidence that either UO or PERS defrauded the state in this way, you should publish it. Until then, I don’t believe a word of it.
No one “defrauded” anyone in the legal sense. They simply interpreted the rules in place at the time to their advantage, and PERS chose not to raise questions.
there is a generic problem and I am part of that problem, much
to my own benefit.
For many years (e.g. about 20) I was able to generate 3 months of summer salary support from NASA and NSF (note: my experience has been that the concept of summer support based on research grants is still regarded as “fake news” by some sector of UO faculty and some sector of union leadership – thus the concept of the 12 month salary is quite real for some of us faculty)
Note of that none of that money came from the State of Oregon, all of it, however, is included in my PERS benefit. This is wrong in principle, but I ain’t given the money back
Assuming your grant pay went through UO, your grant paid for your salary and UO’s overhead, which included payments into PERS. However, if you ran the grant through an off campus institute like ORI or OSLC or the NBER, no PERS payments were made and of course that salary is not part of your UO salary from which your retirement payments are calculated.
yes I understand that
just pointing out that it is a huge advantage with respect to
PERS tier one to get summer salary. Also, in genreal, I never
could make real sense of my PERS earning statement, it
was always 10-15 K *higher* than I can reconcile. This results in a FAS which, while quite good for me, is a number I really can’t reproduce.
I have also had a quite inconsistent history of “overload” pay
and whether not it got included.
Just have your attorney call the PERS hotline and demand “the full Bellotti”.
What’s “wrong in principle” about paying OPE with grant funds?
to me, its unfair to other state employees who don’t have opportunities like this – its also unfair to the 9-month traditional faculty since this pay, again, is coming from the Feds – yes I understand its okay, you deserve it and all of that – simply stating the multiple lenses exist.
ODA — Anyone who has ever paid an employee off a grant knows that UO has been very diligent about charging for PERS contributions.