3 Responses to Why isn’t UO testing student shit?

  1. In so many ways... says:

    I’m also kinda surprised we aren’t doing that.

    At first I misunderstood the title and was curious to know *which* student shit we forgot to test *this time* (there are so many things for students that get implemented in a clearly unready state). It’s kinda depressing how many things this question *could* be fairly applied to, but yeah, this is among the things we should already be testing.

  2. charlie says:

    They’ve haven’t hired the Vice Provost of Interdisciplinary Fecal Communications quite yet. Wonder whose gonna be on that search committee??

  3. Leporello says:

    Very weak reasoning on UO’s part, but I guess they’ll save a little money?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.