OK, if the data for the latest week are accurate — I have no reason to think not, other than a certain cynicism — it has receded some from the week before, both for students and staff. The staff infection rate of 19/5000 in the latest week is about 0.4% — higher than I’d like, but not a disaster (unless you are one of the unlucky ones).
Really, they could relieve a lot of angst and paranoia if they’d just update the graph daily — assuming, of course, that the rates continue to go down rapidly.
as I said in another post, what is significant here in this latest data release is the increase in ON campus cases. I think this reflects under reporting and likely under testing of the ON campus population.
Lane county does update daily (and actually several times daily) so that has always been the more accurate source. No one should be rely on UO dashboard (for this or anything else..).
partly because as I stepped outside during a break from one of my classes to get some fresh air last week, a student walked by talking on his cell phone (full volume) to his friend bragging that he wasn’t going to report to covid corps so he wouldn’t have to isolate… I promptly put my KN95 back on and jumped back into the foxholes we call classrooms.
What with UO’s gonfleur based ventilation strategy being no more effective than prayer, I wonder if the subject line from the next message from our Provost will be “There are no atheists in the classrooms”.
The reporting for week 1/3-1/9 was done daily, or just about…that’s what made the non-reporting for week 1/10-1/16 notable. I’ve been wondering about the radio silence, other than the (inexplicably) low daily case counts…
I took a screenshot on Saturday 1/15 of the then-recent daily counts. At that time, there were four cases reported for the date 1/13. Today, it shows 131 cases on 1/13.
I doubt our angst and paranoia is going to have reason to go down, as the numbers continue to be updated this week.
From the faculty perspective the data look quite promising. Looking at the descriptions of the employee cases most of them seem to be workers in other roles, with a majority being student workers.
While it may be plausible to argue that the university as a whole needs more mitigation, it seems that in person class does not seem to be a danger, at least to the instructor.
I have no reason to think that the data IS accurate. I know that reporting by employees is not 100%. What about temp employees? Since they aren’t “employees of the University” are they included? Are contractors? Who else may be excluded from the data?
The rate of growth is slowing in Oregon and the IMHE model predicted peaks on Jan 18th for the statewide numbers. In a heavily vaccinated population, despite widespread vaccine leakage, the population should get to “herd immunity” thresholds sooner because the effective Rt would be lower, so it’s possible the numbers are right.
But if they had more timely case reporting we’d definitely trust the numbers more.
NOTE: Thumbs up/down on comments has been disabled due to misuse by PR Flack supporters. Sorry!
Townie { According to the BoT packet, UO raised $920.3m for sports during the capital campaign (~10 yrs total). (pg 101, https://trustees.uoregon.edu/sites/trustees1.uoregon.edu/files/2022-05/may-2022-consolidated-board-packet-v.3_1.pdf)... }
Truth { None of them have ever been a university president so why hire them. No experience. No professional relationships. Lien hiring... }
CSN { Also, did you click "four-year" on that graph? Oregon is 5th from the bottom. Only New Hampshire, Vermont, Arizona, and... }
Salmon-powered future { I could totally sell a dam to a salmon. They're just dumb fish. }
honest Uncle Bernie { From a non-economist's perspective -- it always struck me as nice not to have to pump my own in the... }
honest Uncle Bernie { depends on what you count as "the externalities." The Northwest has an abundance of hydropower. But try selling more dams... }
It's Classified. { I'm curious, from an Economist's perspective, what expense or benefit there is to having the additional jobs in the community--... }
non-electric { Just "fill up" your electric car in the the north parking garage FOR FREE! }
Dog { Indeed that has now come to the case for price. In the case of externalities - this is not clear... }
Dog { For the record, the law suit was Wade (Joe) vs Moseley (John) Filed in 2001 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4366383/wade-v-state-of-oregon/ }
Anonymous { The first person hired as the Vice Provost for Institutional Equity and Diversity was Dr. Gregory Vincent. He was not... }
Cheyney Ryan { Note on Robin Holmes as new L + C President: U of O Matters commented upon Robin's departure from the... }
Publius { FIRST ROBIN HOLMES, NOW CHARLES MARTINEZ: https://www.lclark.edu/live/news/47686-dr-robin-holmes-sullivan-named-the-next-president “Through her management of campus crises large and small, Robin has proven herself... }
Fishwrapper { One wonders as one peruses the CV's: how is it that a flagship R1 institution cannot attract someone with commensurate... }
Raghu Parthasarathy { 1 Thanks, all, for the pointers to various books. Since this is a 10--days-old thread, it is unlikely that anyone... }
vhils { Here's a related question that seems right up your alley UOmatters: How much is Nike actually paying to kick out... }
honest Uncle Bernie { Yes, "Unsettled" by Steven Koonin (former professor of physics at Caltech, and provost, i.e. impeccable credentials) is worth reading. I... }
honest Uncle Bernie { Serge, a tad parochial yourself, perhaps? No visual art, music, science or mathematics? }
Prosser { I think the problem is having a law professor as president. The typical law professor, like Schill, only has a... }
Serge Protektor { Is this what happens when you become a university president without an adequate grounding in philosophy, ethics, literature, and history? }
just different { ^^^THIS. Enough already with rich people and their "independent" politics. }
RT @HealeyParera: Yield of a poorly-run presidential search in Maine w no campus input: $205k salary for 1 year for the now-resigned… https://t.co/3f8dTS6xke,May 24
OK, if the data for the latest week are accurate — I have no reason to think not, other than a certain cynicism — it has receded some from the week before, both for students and staff. The staff infection rate of 19/5000 in the latest week is about 0.4% — higher than I’d like, but not a disaster (unless you are one of the unlucky ones).
Really, they could relieve a lot of angst and paranoia if they’d just update the graph daily — assuming, of course, that the rates continue to go down rapidly.
as I said in another post, what is significant here in this latest data release is the increase in ON campus cases. I think this reflects under reporting and likely under testing of the ON campus population.
Lane county does update daily (and actually several times daily) so that has always been the more accurate source. No one should be rely on UO dashboard (for this or anything else..).
partly because as I stepped outside during a break from one of my classes to get some fresh air last week, a student walked by talking on his cell phone (full volume) to his friend bragging that he wasn’t going to report to covid corps so he wouldn’t have to isolate… I promptly put my KN95 back on and jumped back into the foxholes we call classrooms.
What with UO’s gonfleur based ventilation strategy being no more effective than prayer, I wonder if the subject line from the next message from our Provost will be “There are no atheists in the classrooms”.
The reporting for week 1/3-1/9 was done daily, or just about…that’s what made the non-reporting for week 1/10-1/16 notable. I’ve been wondering about the radio silence, other than the (inexplicably) low daily case counts…
I took a screenshot on Saturday 1/15 of the then-recent daily counts. At that time, there were four cases reported for the date 1/13. Today, it shows 131 cases on 1/13.
I doubt our angst and paranoia is going to have reason to go down, as the numbers continue to be updated this week.
UO and Trust are like oil and water.
Anyone else hearing that most students have no idea they’re supposed to report that they’re covid positive?
I’m very skeptical that on campus cases went up but off campus cases did not.
From the faculty perspective the data look quite promising. Looking at the descriptions of the employee cases most of them seem to be workers in other roles, with a majority being student workers.
While it may be plausible to argue that the university as a whole needs more mitigation, it seems that in person class does not seem to be a danger, at least to the instructor.
I have no reason to think that the data IS accurate. I know that reporting by employees is not 100%. What about temp employees? Since they aren’t “employees of the University” are they included? Are contractors? Who else may be excluded from the data?
I don’t believer this is cynical at all.
I know of 2 faculty with PLC offices who have tested positive since classes started. I don’t see any PLC employees listed in the employee data. Weird.
The rate of growth is slowing in Oregon and the IMHE model predicted peaks on Jan 18th for the statewide numbers. In a heavily vaccinated population, despite widespread vaccine leakage, the population should get to “herd immunity” thresholds sooner because the effective Rt would be lower, so it’s possible the numbers are right.
But if they had more timely case reporting we’d definitely trust the numbers more.