Gottfredson unable to find qualified “Faculty Athletics Representative”

9/22/2014 update: Gottfredson’s last official act before skipping town with his $940K was to appoint former journalism dean Tim Gleason to replace longtime NCAA Faculty Athletics Representative Jim O’Fallon (Law), after presumptive heir Rob Illig (Law) crashed and burned with his viral “I’m worth $1M, so screw you unemployed law grads” campaign. The FAR’s are having their national meeting in November in New Orleans. For more info about what the FAR is supposed to do to balance the interests of big-time Duck sports and its multi-million dollar employees with our academic mission, try here. Meanwhile the UO Senate needs to decide what to do about Gleason – specifically this proposed legislation from Pedro Garcia-Caro calling for a Senate role in appointing a new FAR.

7/21/2014 update:

This winter Gottfredson set up a search committee to find a replacement for Jim O’Fallon (Law), who has had the FAR job for 25 years and who been the subject of repeated Senate motions and reports calling for a review and replacement. The Senate will take this up again in the fall. Andy Karduna (Human Phys) agreed to chair the committee, despite Gottfredson’s secrecy requirements. Karduna reported to the IAC and the Senate that the secrecy (and presumably Gottfredson’s control-freak job description and the requirement of a year-long apprenticeship to O’Fallon) kept several qualified and interested faculty from applying. Rumor has it that Rob Illig (Law) wanted the job, but his $1 Million salary goal was a bit too steep. The appointment was supposed to be made in June, but apparently there are still no takers.

6/20/2014 update: Gottfredson appoints IAC-lite, to evade faculty oversight of athletics

The day after President Gottfredson got the EPD report on the basketball rape allegations he decided to dismantle the Senate Intercollegiate Athletic Committee and appoint his own handpicked group of faculty to a new “Advisory Group”. Still no word on who Gottfredson will appoint as FAR in training. At least a few qualified and interested faculty refused to apply under the terms of Gottfredson’s secret search. The Senate will vote on legislation for a new search in the Fall, in any case.

In the past the IAC has asked some tough questions about athletics, and occasionally got some answers. It seems that neither is acceptable to our President. This is an end run around the UO Constitution, faculty governance, the NCAA rules, all that is right and holy, and what UO has been telling its academic accreditors.

Meanwhile, as described below, the real IAC has held a successful, open meeting, elected a new chair, and is ready to do the real job of faculty governance. Gottfredson’s announcement on his IAC-lite advisory group, to be chaired by Kim Sheehan (Advertising) is here:

The President’s Advisory Group on Intercollegiate Athletics advises the president on University of Oregon Athletics Department policies and practices as they affect the academic progress, the academic performance, and the well-being of student athletes. The group will provide guidance and make recommendations to help ensure athletic department programs and practices operate consistent with the university’s academic mission and comply with NCAA and Pac-12 rules and expectations.

The PAGIA will meet regularly twice per term. The group will assemble for additional sessions at the request of the president. Membership will consist of six faculty members, two students, three administrators, three staff advisors as well as the athletic director, senior associate athletic director and faculty athletic representative.

Members

Faculty:
Professor Kim Sheehan, School of Journalism and Communications, Chair
Professor Jenifer Craig, School of Music and Dance
Professor David Frank, Clark Honors College
Professor James Isenberg, Mathematics
Professor Lynn Kahle, Lindquist School of Business
One yet to be appointed

Students:
Jillian Alleyne, Communication Disorders and Science major, Basketball
David Spencer, Accounting major

Administrators:
Roger Thompson, Vice President for Enrollment Management
Lisa Freinkel, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies
Paul Shang, Dean of Students

Ex-Officio Members
Intercollegiate Athletic Director, Rob Mullens
Senior Associate Athletic Director, Senior Women’s Administrator, Lisa Peterson
Faculty Athletics Representative, Jim O’Fallon
FAR Designee, to be appointed

Staff Advisors
Jody Sykes, Senior Associate Athletic Director Compliance Officer
Sue Eveland, University Registrar
Steven Stolp, Executive Director, Services for Student Athletes

6/9/2014: Intercollegiate Athletics Committee elects Kurt Krueger as chair

Krueger is a longtime UO staff member in printing services, serving in his 5th year on the IAC. This afternoon he defeated Andy Karduna (Human Phys) in an election to be the 2014-15 chair.

Both candidates spoke to the need to deal with the threat to shared governance from President Gottfredson’s unilateral decision to take away the IAC’s oversight of athletics, get the athletic department back to the table, and generally repair the damage to the IAC’s credibility done by last year’s chair Rob Illig (Law), who came under heavy criticism at today’s meeting (which he skipped).

Krueger pledged to work with Senate President Kyr, President Gottfredson, and the AD to get the committee back to work. He also gave a strong endorsement of the Senate’s new open meetings policy. This year’s agenda will likely focus on student-athlete academic support, sexual assault prevention training for athletes, and the process for vetting special athletic admits, in addition to the other items in the IAC charge, here.

Karduna had been on Illig’s executive committee, and was Gottfredson’s choice to run his secret Faculty Athletics Representative search. The Senate has repudiated that search once already, and has legislation on the agenda for fall to reform the process. Karduna was asked some tough questions about his role in helping Illig run the IAC, and his agreement to chair the secret FAR search despite Senate opposition.

Apparently I wasn’t the only person left unsatisfied by Karduna’s answers. The committee voted 11 to 1 to elect Krueger.

6/5/2014 update: President Gottfredson dismantles faculty supervision of Duck athletics

After the rape allegations broke on May5th, it came out that President Gottfredson had known about them since March 9th. He got the final EPD investigation report on April 28. The next day he dismantled faculty supervision of Duck athletics. Too many tough questions? Timeline here.

4/30/2014: Troy Brynelson has the scoop in the Daily Emerald, here. Gottfredson’s email to Senate President Margie Paris is below. I don’t know of any previous UO President who has dismantled a Senate committee by fiat. I have the feeling there’s more of this coming from President Gottfredson.

This is clearly a bad decision for UO and for shared governance. For that matter I’m not sure it’s the right decision for Gottfredson, who – with his new hand-picked advisory committee – will now have responsibility for the Duck athletics program and all its problems. Frohnmayer would have looked for a way to spread the blame!

Back in 2001 President Frohnmayer dealt with the inherent conflicts between athletics and academics by working with Senate President Nathan Tublitz to establish a joint Administration/Senate Athletics Task Force. He made a point of including Jim Earl (English) and Tublitz (Biology), even though they were the strongest and most vociferous faculty critics of UO’s increasing emphasis on big-time sports.

That committee’s 2004 report called for a number of reforms, including an end to athletic subsidies. The Senate responded to this report by charging it’s Intercollegiate Athletics Committee with keeping an eye on the athletic department’s finances, facilities, donations, and the academic outcomes of athletes.

In contrast, President Gottfredson has dealt with the conflicts by simply gutting the IAC, saying he will no longer even require athletic department administrators to meet with the committee, much less share the sorts of information that they are required to share by our Senate charge. He will replace it with a new administrative advisory group, staffed with his own appointees, and charged with doing whatever he wants them to do. Bob Berdahl tried to do something similar back in 2012 – emails here – but got scared off by worries the NCAA would see this as a “loss of institutional control“. But the NCAA’s got bigger things to deal with these days, like the O’Bannon lawsuit and player’s unions.

Gottfredson’s stated reason is a report from IAC Chair Rob Illig (Law) to the Senate, describing the IAC’s often contentious meetings, and specifically Bill Harbaugh’s role in them. (That’s me.) While Illig told the IAC he would consult with the IAC before submitting this report, he didn’t – it’s entirely his own work. Some on the committee agree with Illig’s conclusions, some do not. The Senate has not even considered Illig’s report, except for a statement of disapproval from Randy Sullivan (Chemistry) about it’s ad hominem nature, at the last meeting.

I was elected by the faculty to the Senate’s Intercollegiate Athletics Committee in 2011, and re-elected in 2013. I’m pretty sure the people who voted for me knew that I would ask uncomfortable questions and push for more transparency and accountability. And I have, starting with questions about basic finances and academic subsidies for the Jaqua Center for Student Athletes, and continuing with questions about why the academic budget was subsidizing athletics overhead, the legal costs of the Chip Kelly/Willie Lyles investigation, the way that Rob Mullens imposed a new policy on drug testing, the bowl game junkets for the administrators who approved the athletic budget, the $235M in bonds for the Matt Court Arena, long overdue reviews for FAR Jim O’Fallon, the sham athletes only courses UO has set up, AD monitoring of athletes social media, etc.

The UO athletic department hates it when faculty ask these questions. They hate seeing the news stories and the increasing skepticism about the system that they’ve grown rich from, and the NYTimes laughing at their pretensions. They really hate it when the results cost them money, as with the arena financing deal and the overhead rates. They hated it when the Senate voted for my motion to move some of their profits from their own pay to academic scholarships. Naturally these IAC meetings get a little contentious, and there’s always pushback and legal threats from the administration:

Dear Rob [Kyr, Senate President] and Brian [McWhorter, IAC Chair;

I received your email of July 24, 2012, requesting a delay in the public hearing scheduled for August 23rd, 2012. The hearing will be rescheduled for September 13, 2012. Written comments will be accepted until noon on September 14, 2012. We will similarly postpone the date the rule will be filed with the Secretary of State and become final. The rule will be filed on September 21, 2012.

Your allegations about the University’s rulemaking processes are offensive and false , as are the comments made publicly by members of the Intercollegiate Athletics Committee. I ask that you apologize in writing to President Berdahl, Rob Mullens, and me. I also ask that you censure the members of the IAC who have published offensive and defamatory comments.

Randolph Geller

General Counsel, University of Oregon

And now that the Senate has voted to make IAC meetings public, well, the potential for embarrassment and expense has gone up quite a bit. So President Gottfredson has ended any pretense of faculty oversight of athletics – even when it comes to academic matters. If the Senate can come up with a new arrangement that suits the President, perhaps he will change this decision. Perhaps not.

From: President Gottfredson
To: Margaret Paris
Date: April 29, 2014 at 9:21 AM
Subject: Interim Athletic Advisory Group

April 29, 2014

President Margaret Paris

Dear Margie,

It has become necessary for me to appoint an advisory group to provide
advice and recommendations on intercollegiate athletic issues. As you
know, the chair of the University Senate’s Intercollegiate Athletics
Committee (IAC), has made this recommendation. It is critical that the
university have an advisory group, one that operates such that all
members can participate in an environment free of the numerous problems
the chair clearly identifies in his report to the senate.

To be effective, this committee must ask critical questions, participate in
rational and informed deliberations, have a clear mission, and must not be
regarded as hostile to individual members, staff, or students. The president
and athletic director need advice and independent perspectives, designed
to ensure that our programs operate consistent with our academic mission
and standards, and comply, at the highest levels, with NCAA and Pac-12
rules and expectations.

This new advisory group will have members from faculty, staff, students,
and administration. I invite your nominations of faculty members. I intend to
request that the athletic administrators, the Faculty Athletic
Representative, and other administrative staff work with this advisory
group, including providing appropriate information that the committee
deems necessary, in lieu of the IAC. This will be an interim measure, until
the senate appropriately addresses the issues raised in the chair’s report.

Regards,

Michael R. Gottfredson
President

Rob Illig’s full report is here:

Summary

I wish to report my conclusion – and the conclusion of many of the members of the IAC –
that the committee is broken. Its acrimonious relationship with the President, the NCAA
Faculty Athletics Representative, and the Athletic Director makes it impossible for the
committee to achieve its stated goals. More fundamentally, the IAC’s functioning is
materially hampered by confusion among its members and the larger UO community
regarding its proper role and the extent of its powers. This is primarily a problem of
structure rather than a problem of personalities. Or, to put it differently, we can solve the
problem by changing the structure, but we cannot change the personalities.

Based on the foregoing conclusions, I will recommend that the President withdraw the
administration’s and athletics department’s involvement in the IAC, thereby making it
purely a creature of the Senate. Having done this, he should appoint – in consultation with
the FAR and AD – a small group of trusted faculty who can advise these individuals during
the process of their decisionmaking.

I further recommend that the Senate consider revising the IAC’s official charge to re-focus
the committee on student-athlete welfare, including by investigating the academic culture
in which UO student-athletes are immersed. Finally, I recommend that the Senate
investigate the impact of conflicts of interest on proper committee functioning.

Rob Illig photo courtesy of “Around the O”:

Screen Shot 2014-04-30 at 2.00.54 AM

Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

48 Responses to Gottfredson unable to find qualified “Faculty Athletics Representative”

  1. Sam Dotters-Katz, ASUO Presidento says:

    Not just a few, but a MAJORITY of the IAC agreed with Illig’s conclusions. We talked about this at our last meeting. A broken committee that you used to launch attack after attack on the athletic department did nothing to promote shared governance. This was necessary, and will actually allow for the important cross-campus interaction that the IAC was no longer capable of providing.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +1 (from 15 votes)
    • uomatters says:

      You’re right Sam, I’m just upset that the athletic department gave you an Alamo Bowl junket, and left me in Eugene.

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 13 votes)
    • Aren't you gone yet, Sam? says:

      Was a vote taken in the IAC to support this, Sam? I’m guessing Illig couldn’t even get that much done.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 11 votes)
    • empty says:

      see, now this is journalism; professional, mature, we need more transparency so Bill can continue to stroke his ego

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +3 (from 9 votes)
    • Not that says:

      we had a vote or anything, Sam just read our minds apparently. Congratulations on your graduation Sam.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Gott Guts? says:

    Gottfredson will continue to hide behind empty rhetoric, feigned disapproval for a lack of decorum and delay tactics. He doesn’t even agree with himself:

    “It has become necessary for me to appoint an advisory group to provide advice and recommendations on intercollegiate athletic issues.”

    BUT

    “The president and athletic director need advice and independent perspectives”

    Appointed committees rarely result in independent perspectives.

    This President has proven unable to deal with contentious disagreement with his perspective (“Asked and answered”) and now he won’t have to on this issue.

    Katz – the IAC has given the power to the President because it failed to clean its own house. The IAC and the Senate should have dealt with this before a unilateral recommendation from the Chair to dismantle the IAC. This is a boneheaded move.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +6 (from 10 votes)
  3. Anas Clypeata says:

    Our university administration has never been good at facing challenging questions, whether they are about overoptimistic projections of Matthew Knight arena revenues, overoptimistic UO Portland budgets, persistent salary inequity, training of faculty to manage staff (or doing away with the need for same), or providing adequate levels of classroom space to accommodate a growing student population.

    There are (and, in some cases, were) many intelligent people at our university, and they have proposed answers to all of these questions. Their answers are not usually listened to.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +8 (from 10 votes)
  4. Same Rob Illig says:

    Thanks for that photo, I’d wondered if it was that same law perfesser that had been ranting about his lost million dollars. http://gawker.com/law-prof-rips-school-for-helping-poor-grads-and-not-giv-1564196317

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +5 (from 7 votes)
    • anon says:

      Sure is. Our president relies on the best and brightest when making all of his decisions. Can you believe he was fortunate enough this time to take advice from a could-be-seven-figure lawyer? Awesome sauce.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +9 (from 11 votes)
  5. Committee Member says:

    To Dotters-Katz: I am an elected faculty member of the IAC and must respond that you have no idea whether a ‘MAJORITY’ of the IAC membership supported Illig’s report or not. The report was not shared with the committee, nor was the committee given an opportunity to vote or comment on it. The report reflects Illig’s views not the committee members.

    I, for one, do not support the report and I know a number of IAC colleagues who agree with me. In my view, the committee has been non-functional largely because Illig stopped holding meetings or leading the committee in any way that could be productive.

    The most disappointing thing, however, is that President Gottfredson would accept a rogue report from Professor Illig without consultation with the committee or any input from elected representatives on that committee.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +16 (from 24 votes)
    • Gott Guts? says:

      Amen. It also calls into question Illig’s claim that he could make a million dollars as a corporate lawyer when he can’t even lead a faculty committee.

      Ironic that Illig was so upset with the decision to forgo raises in the law school because it was made without consulting all the relevant stakeholders. Hmmmm….

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +13 (from 17 votes)
    • Sam Dotters-Katz, ASUO Presidento says:

      Then why do you feel uncomfortable giving your name to stand behind your statement? The majority of folks at our last meeting were in agreement about why the committee was broken, which was articulated in Rob’s report. Attacking Rob doesn’t do much to prove your point.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: -8 (from 18 votes)
      • Another committee member says:

        I expect Sam was too busy yelling at Bill to know whether not the rest of us were in agreement. The views of those who shouted loudest were very well articulated in Illig’s report.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: +2 (from 8 votes)
  6. Publius says:

    Is Rob Illig still the front runner to be the new faculty athletic representative, or did whining about not getting a raise take him out of contention?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
  7. Another committee member says:

    Agreed, the report is appalling, and most certainly does not get my support. The leadership of the IAC has been abysmal, and I would judge that lack of leadership to be the primary reason for the committee’s problems this year.
    As to the President disbanding the IAC on the basis of Illig’s report. Surely not. The report just gives him an excuse. But if the idea is to silence the critics he will be sorely disappointed. I’m confident that uomatters will continue to give the administration excellent advice, wanted or not.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +5 (from 13 votes)
  8. also on IAC says:

    In my mind, there’s been a long game unfolding all year. Sam DK brought his buddies with him to fight, so looked for fights at every corner and responded to substantive questions with an attitude that “this one” (i.e., whatever was most recent) would be the one to take UOM down with. Sloppy methods, for the most part, so it only bread frustration and the odd car being vandalized.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 10 votes)
  9. Cat says:

    Beating up on Illig is fun (apparently) but it must be pointed out: 1) that Illig is also an elected member of the committee, just like the others; 2) that he was elected to chair the committee; 3) that the IAC has been plagued by factionalism and finger-pointing for a long time now, regardless of the efforts of some to make it sound like Illig created that situation; and 4) the IAC has been dysfunctional or ineffective at monitoring or providing a campus voice on issues related to athletic for a very long time, going back (as noted above) to 2001/2004.

    We’ve hit a collective impasse. Illig called it as he saw it; Harbaugh has long called it as he sees it (on UOM and elsewhere); other members of the IAC, past and present, have done so; now Gottfredson is doing so. All have that right; some have power too.

    The question is what to do next–given the significance of #4. And here, alas, Anas Clypeata is right. There are a variety of possible paths forward, a variety of smart people who might come up with them or carry them out, but they’re not like to be heard by any of the parties. We’ll all have to just sit back and watch it play out.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)
  10. Hen says:

    First the IAC, and then……..? This seem to me to be a dangerous precedent for shared governance.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +4 (from 6 votes)
  11. New shit says:

    The incoming ASUO President gets to appoint 5 of the 18 voting members of the IAC. Dotters-Katz appointed Mac and his frat-boy buddies. The new ASUO President would have appointed some skeptics, and they would have had the votes to elect a good chair. So Gottfredson had to dissolve the committee first.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +5 (from 7 votes)
    • anonec says:

      This comment has been deleted by the editor.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
      • Sam Dotters-Katz, ASUO Presidento says:

        As to this comment, because the IAC was broken, there really wasn’t much influence of anyone, any constituency, on the Athletic Department. Also, student ticket prices are not decided in the IAC, they are decided through negotiations between the ASUO’s ACFC, a finance committee. But keep talking and maybe you will randomly get something right.

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: -7 (from 9 votes)
        • skeptic says:

          Sam is it true you took money from the athletic department for an Alamo Bowl junket? Wouldn’t that be a bit of a conflict of interest, given your were on the IAC and overseeing the negotiations on how much ASUO would pay them for tickets?

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)
          • Sam Dotters-Katz, ASUO Presidento says:

            I went to the Alamo Bowl, don’t know who paid for it, don’t care. The IAC doesn’t make any decisions with any weight so that’s not a conflict. The ACFC decides the inter-governmental agreement with Athletics, not me. Again, please you have to get something right eventually if you keep throwing random accusations out there so keep going.

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: -1 (from 5 votes)
          • anonec says:

            Any other trips you did and didn’t care about who is paying? Interesting attitude in 2014 – you may have missed the increased demands for transparency and accountability of elected office holders…

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
          • chuck says:

            Wow, someone pays your way, and you don’t know, don’t care? One of the most absurd, yet revelatory, statements ever on UO Matters….

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: +4 (from 6 votes)
    • Sam Dotters-Katz, ASUO Presidento says:

      I am not in a Frat, and never have been. As for your comment that the University President made this action because he was concerned about who a new ASUO President would appoint to the IAC, that is laughable.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: -5 (from 9 votes)
      • anon says:

        You know, Sam, every time you open your mouth you are making it more expensive for your mother to pay for your next position. What was it for your ASUO campaign, 30k?

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: +3 (from 13 votes)
        • skeptic says:

          Is there any actual evidence of this $30K? Contributions are supposedly capped at $500.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • Sam Dotters-Katz, ASUO Presidento says:

          Don’t low ball me, add a zero to that number.

          VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: +2 (from 6 votes)
          • anonec says:

            So what were your two campaign budgets and who donated? Any transparency there?

            VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
            Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
      • chuck says:

        You know Sam, given the level of student apathy/stupidity, it’s pretty apparent why you’re where you’re at…..

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
    • Mac says:

      You must realize no one cares about the ASUO, with the exception of the people in ASUO…

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  12. chuck says:

    Isn’t Gottfredson Lariviere’s boy? Man, thanks Dick, we got ourselves a real pearl in this here pro. Wait until the full privatization of U of O takes place, should do wonders for academic integrity….

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • anonec says:

      Lariviere? He was recommended by Berdahl. Different team.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  13. IAC hopeful says:

    Kurt Krueger… excellent choice. May he serve well.

    Of course, if he shows up he will have already outperformed million-dollar Illig.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  14. Anon says:

    Kurt’s speech was a breath of fresh air.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  15. Anono says:

    Any truth to the rumor Gottfredson will give Dev Sinha the FAR job?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • uomatters says:

      Dev Sinha has all the qualifications needed to replace Jim O’Fallon.

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  16. Anonymous says:

    David Frank will ask some tough questions, don’t expect much from the others.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -2 (from 4 votes)
  17. K. Haakon says:

    Gottfredson asked the Senate to nominate faculty for this. To their credit, the Senate refused.

    The faculty that agreed are a vile race of Quislings, hired to fawn upon the conqueror, to collaborate in his designs and to enforce his rule upon their fellow countrymen while groveling low themselves.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -3 (from 5 votes)
  18. Old Man says:

    Kim Sheehan’s (Advertising) appointment as Chair of President’s Athletic Advisory Committee makes it appear that Mike’s primary concern is defense of the brand. Perhaps that liberates the University Standing Committee to give priority to the concerns of the student athletes.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  19. Sam Dotters-Katz says:

    This is great news, and the committee seems to be full of very reputable and responsible folks. By the way, you are lying again in this article. You say he decided to make this group the day after he got the EPD report, that is incorrect and you have no proof of that, not that you ever need any to make wild accusations. He made public his decision on the day in question. That is different from deciding. I spoke to the President several times throughout the year about the need for a separate committee or group to fulfill the role of the IAC, since you had effectively destroyed the IAC, caused student members to resign after your harassment, ect. In those conversations he was clearly considering it, and to imply that he did so because of the rape allegations is just another careless slanting of the facts you love to engage in.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 10 votes)
    • uomatters says:

      Thanks for sharing your perspective Sam. Do you have any objections to me posting your many emails to me and the IAC listserv on these matters?

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 6 votes)
    • V.I. Lennon says:

      Sam, you are my favorite полезные дураки.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
    • Anonymous says:

      It doesn’t matter that you, Sam, were for dismantling the IAC so quit tooting your own horn.

      The fact is Gott has done an end around on faculty governance and this new committe can only be a sham – meaning without power or legitimacy. As Old Man points out, it’s window dressing and will only produce what Gott wants…protection of the image that everything is fine.

      It should never be called a Faculty advisory group because it is not a legitimate body sanctioned by the Senate through a Senate vote.

      That action by Gott is a bad sign, one even you Sam should recognize if you weren’t so blinded by your own ambitions. To completely abandon a legitimate body in favor of an illegitimate body because the former is dysfunctional sets a bad precedent and signals that Gott has little regard for our governance structure.

      Haven’t you graduated…moved on yet?

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: +1 (from 7 votes)
  20. Anonymous says:

    I heard Dev Sinha (Math) is willing to take the job.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  21. Nobody says:

    Sam is it true you will be a student at the school until you are 95 and that you plan on eliminating the term limit of the asuo president so you can be president until your dying day?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.