Google Ads – all profits for single malt
Recent Comments. Deleted if (content + humor)/nastiness < Euler's number. Please use a screen name.
- UO Senate committee aims to... (1)
- dog well they can;'t make it worse, that;s for sure! – Wednesday
- Admin declares student protester guilty,... (36)
- Right Free Speech In cracking down on progressive free speech in the name of free speech, the UOrwell is once again on the cutting edge of a negative... – Tuesday
- Payroll Guy Just because someone is Jewish doesn't put them above supporting oppression. Actions are the true gauge, not your identity. – Friday
- uomatters Or http://uomatters.com/2017/09/uo-is-failing-on-economic-diversity-wheres-the-diversity-action-plan.html for highlites of the UO data. Worth pointing out that Pres Schill's plan for spending the $50M includes a CoE initiative which is... – Saturday
- link https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/18/upshot/some-colleges-have-more-students-from-the-top-1-percent-than-the-bottom-60.html?_r=1&mtrref=undefined – Saturday
- Mandatory Implicit Bias Training starts... (5)
- uomatters Got a link? – Tuesday
- Check out the Search Advocate training at Oregon State University. It's coordinated out of Academic Affairs and was featured in the Chronicle of Higher Education. – Tuesday
- uomatters I agree. It's tough to mix science and advocacy without going off the rails in one direction or another - particularly when you're being paid... – Thursday
- too much caffeine I thought it was interesting and that Erik did a good job. – Thursday
- Dog Yes I have already bitched, extensively, that this mandatory check box is insulting and a waste of time for faculty. But no one above us... – Thursday
- Oregon soccer takes a knee... (10)
- Fishwrapper Sports is the locale, not the context. – Tuesday
- Max Powers Are you sure? I read a lot about sports on here.... – Tuesday
- Niccolo M Does anybody actually realize that kneeling is a higher form of reverence than standing? Shouldn't every "real" American kneel? – Monday
- uomatters Thanks for your comment, but this is not really a sports blog. – Monday
- Julia Ward Howe Readers may better know the later song that borrowed the melody from this, "Battle Hymn of the Republic." – Monday
- Sports Fan Surprised the entire team hasn't been suspended or disbanded. Based on results on the pitch, that would have occurred years ago. – Monday
- uomatters Yeah, I've always preferred "John Brown's Body:" John Brown’s body lies moldering in the grave, While weep the sons of bondage whom he ventured all... – Monday
- What a country "No refuge could save the hireling and slave From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave," Our national anthem contains a line... – Monday
- Duck AD Rob Mullens fails... (11)
- bah humbug Good job Pres run this place into the ground one expensive Administrator at a time. – Monday
- Suey! Thanks for reporting on the outrageous duck pork. Keep up the good work. The board should be all over Rob's robbery, but they're AWOL. If... – Sunday
- Niccolo M And how about tuition increases? Staff and faculty have unions that will speak for them and might thereby indirectly, magically, limit unreasonably high spending on... – Sunday
- Presidents and provosts gather in... (2)
- solidcitizen "It is a business. We sell education certificates for tuition money." Right. And when our customers are telling us that we are charging too much... – Monday
- Conservative duck "Marginalized students don’t have a voice on campus..." I'm sorry, what? The Daily Emerald seems to be available to you. Do you not have a... – Monday
- Faculty Union ratifies contract extension... (6)
- uomatters Sorry, but to quote Julius Caesar or at least some screenwriter for HBO's Rome series, "arithmetic has no mercy". You will be missed. – Thursday
- Simplius Simplicissimus You are right, I should have looked up the exact number of folks in the bargaining unit. I based the 259 votes cast on 2000,... – Thursday
- uomatters Thanks, that's About 25% of the members, or 16% of the bargaining unit. – Wednesday
- notamathprof The letter that UoMatters links to says 250-9. That's 259 in my math class. – Wednesday
- uomatters I'm so sorry that your colleagues have disappointed you, and that you can't do basic math. – Tuesday
- Simplius Simplicissimus 259 votes? That's barely above 10% of the UA constituency, no? Voting was exceedingly simple, I feel disappointed by the turn-out. – Tuesday
- RG explains UO plans for... (14)
- Other flagships I wonder how our operating costs and numbers of out-of-state students compare with OSU? – Wednesday
- Focused anger cuts Feel free to develop and share your proposal to address administrative bloat, and be sure to share your numbers, and name those administrators you would... – Wednesday
- Thomas Hager Oregon could do a lot better with higher ed funding. But if I'm reading this data right, the state this biennium is providing as much... – Wednesday
- Focused anger cuts Problem is, as you surely know, the people of the state of Oregon not enrolled at the university "decided" to essentially stop funding us. So,... – Wednesday
- Thomas Hager It's a form of bait-and-switch. The UO was established as a public university by the people of the state for the education of students from... – Tuesday
- uomatters You're right, that's the focus for now. Sorry for being snappish. – Monday
- a big change This is all just preparation for UO enrolling a majority of out of state students. For a few years UO has been obsessed with having... – Monday
- UO community member The Knight Campus is a step in the right direction and I support this endeavor. However, it is my understanding that it will enroll a... – Monday
- Today: CAS holds student town... (1)
- Economic Diversity Thank you for continuing to focus on the growing lack of economic diversity at the UO. This is truly where the diversity rhetoric rubber meets... – Wednesday
- No truth to rumors Nazi's... (1)
- Max Powers Renault: Everybody is to leave here immediately! This cafe is closed until further notice. Clear the room, at once! Rick: How can you close me... – Wednesday
- Full text of Pres Mike... (2)
- Conservative duck Black Cultural Center? Why? Why not Tibetan? Or Palestinian? How is this supposed to make me feel "included and welcome"? Students chanting "This is a... – Monday
- Older »
- UO Senate committee aims to... (1)
- UO administration declares student protester guilty, *then* starts conduct code investigation - https://t.co/MprOG26kaT, 2 hours ago
- RT @cjciaramella: My man Harold Cross, former legal counsel to the American Society of News Editors: https://t.co/fHjuAk2W6l, 11 hours ago
- RT @MarshallYoum: Trump's anti-press attacks undercutting US prestige as a torchbearer of freedom & democracy. https://t.co/hQV3Rn7b7D @Sulliview's column., 11 hours ago
- Former basketball player files lawsuit against Duck Coach Dana Altman - https://t.co/2a9aiPJB7K, 14 hours ago
- RT @jackpitcher20: Former basketball recruit sues UO coaches after tearing his ACL during workout: https://t.co/cFCZkxekUN, 18 hours ago
TagsAAUP-AFT Union? Academic Freedom administrative bloat Athletics athletics subsidy Beangrams Dave Frohnmayer: UO President Dave Hubin Diversity Faculty pay Faculty Union (United Academics of UO) free speech Jamie Moffitt Jim Bean: UO Provost Jim O'Fallon jock box Lariviere Firing Lorraine Davis March 8-9 rape allegations Melinda Grier Michael Gottfredson NCAA NCAA violations new partnership plan off topic OUS Board and Chancellor Pernsteiner PERS Public Records Public Safety Randy Geller General Counsel Research money Richard Lariviere: UO President Robert Berdahl Rob Mullens Scott Coltrane Senate Sharon Rudnick Tim Gleason Track and Field Championships Uncategorized UO Foundation UO Presidential Archives UO restructuring plan UO Trustees
- UO Senate Agenda to include important UOPD announcement 10/18/2017
- UO Senate committee aims to improve student course evaluation process 10/17/2017
- Former basketball player files lawsuit against Duck Coach Dana Altman 10/17/2017
- Admin declares student protester guilty, then starts conduct code investigation 10/17/2017
- Today: CAS holds student town hall on “Diversity Action Plans” 10/17/2017
- Health Center nurse files discrimination, retaliation lawsuit 10/16/2017
- Oregon soccer takes a knee – what will Altman and Wiltshire do? 10/16/2017
- Presidents and provosts gather in their safe-space to talk free speech 10/16/2017
- Duck AD Rob Mullens fails to show UO the money, gets 71% pay cut 10/15/2017
- Former interim UO Provost Frances Bronet gets her dream job at Pratt 10/12/2017
- Mandatory Implicit Bias Training starts by noting IBT doesn’t change behavior 10/12/2017
- No truth to rumors Nazi’s have shut down the UO Faculty Club 10/10/2017
- Faculty Union ratifies contract extension 250-9 10/10/2017
- LA Times wants a copy of any FBI subpoenas of Dana Altman’s Ducks 10/09/2017
- UO Public Records Office doing its best to hide Tim Gleason’s docs 10/09/2017
- RG explains UO plans for 3K more out-of-state students 10/09/2017
- Editor withdraws pro-colonialism paper after credible threats of violence 10/09/2017
- Full text of Pres Mike Schill’s 2017 State of the University speech 10/06/2017
- Vin Lananna’s Tracktown non-profit sets up “Oregon 21” for-profit LLC to spend state’s $25M IAAF subsidy 10/05/2017
- UO supporter Lorry Lokey is a generous and funny guy 10/05/2017
UO Board Chair Chuck Lillis's grade so far
- A (10%, 30 Votes)
- B (5%, 15 Votes)
- C (13%, 39 Votes)
- D (23%, 66 Votes)
- F (49%, 142 Votes)
Total Voters: 292Loading ...
President Mike Schill's grade so far
- A (23%, 113 Votes)
- B (29%, 140 Votes)
- C (17%, 80 Votes)
- D (12%, 56 Votes)
- F (19%, 92 Votes)
Total Voters: 481Loading ...
3/2/2015 update: No word on whether or not BOT Secretary Angela Wilhelm will tear down that wall of PR flack tables separating the Trustees from the university community during this Thursday and Friday’s meetings, but it’s a good sign that 20 months into their term in office, the Board is willing to meet with faculty. I’m on the list, so Wilhelm’s assistant Amanda Hatch can’t have been screening people too carefully:
March 3, 2015
TO: Individuals Attending Faculty/Trustee Discussions
FROM: Susan Gary, Faculty Trustee
RE: Thoughts on the March 6 Discussions
Thank you for your willingness and interest in participating in the discussions with UO trustees this
Friday, March 6, at 8:00 AM. These conversations will give the trustees a great opportunity to learn
more about the faculty – what we do, our strengths and the challenges we face. I thought it would be
helpful to provide some ideas about conversation topics, although these are not restrictive. You should
feel free to discuss any issues of concern to you, and the trustees may have questions they want to ask.
The conversations will evolve, as conversations do.
Our initial target size was 10 faculty members and three trustees per group. Given the number of
people who expressed interest, we can accommodate everyone if we increase the group size to 11, so
that is what we have decided to do. I think 11 should be fine; if you would prefer to wait until June (we
plan to have more discussions then), please let Amanda Hatch know and we can save your information.
The trustees will want to hear from everyone, so please be courteous with respect to time so that
everyone can have a chance to speak. It’s a conversation, so multiple short comments will likely be
better than one long comment per person.
Here are suggested topics for discussion that I brainstormed. I use “faculty” to include both TTF and
NTTF because most topics apply to both, although sometimes in different ways.
– What do the classifications of faculty as TTF and NTTF – mean? (and NTRF and Library faculty if
someone can speak to those categories)
– What roles do different faculty members play?
– What is the promotion process like for TTF and NTTF?
– What contributes to teaching excellence?
– How much work goes into preparing a class?
– How do teachers keep their classes fresh?
– How does the Teaching Effectiveness Program work with faculty to improve teaching? (Have you
taken advantage of TEP and what has been the benefit?)
– How does research contribute to teaching?
– What are classroom conditions like – technology, class size, and configuration of classrooms?
– How do negative factors hinder teaching excellence – increases in class size, increased teaching
– What kind of University and unit service do faculty do?
– What is the service work load and what types of service work do faculty do (admissions,
scholarships, curriculum, hiring, promotion and tenure, etc.)
– How does the level of service required affect teaching and scholarship?
– How do faculty mentor students?
– Undergraduates? What kind of mentoring do undergrads need? What are the
challenges/rewards of mentoring undergrads?
– Graduate students? What is the relationship between an advisor and a
candidate? How does advising a grad student work?
– How do faculty help students think about career options?
– What is the role of research for a TTF?
– What is the grant writing process like?
– What is the publication process like?
Masters or Ph.D.
– What synergies exist among the research, teaching and service obligations of faculty members?
– (Note: There is a lot to say about research, but this is an area the trustees have already had
some exposure to, so it may be good to focus on other topics.)
– How do TTF and NTTF interact within units?
– How do units govern themselves?
– What role does the Senate play? What role should the Senate play?
– Do faculty feel engaged with the Senate?
This probably deserves a separate discussion when issues can be discussed more thoroughly – there is a
lot of work needed to develop a strategy – but someone may have particular insights to share.
2/25/2015 update: Ron Bramhall (Business) and faculty union VP for NTTFs, persuades the BOT’s sole Faculty Trustee, Susan Gary (Law), to invite NTTFs to meetings with Board members:
While these are much more complete than in the past, and while the Board has helpfully abandoned its previous strategy of holding meetings when the students are away on break, Secretary Angela Wilhelms has pre-redacted some of the most potentially interesting info from the agenda (docket) links, saying it’s not ready yet, or will be passed out in dead-tree format at the meeting. In the past she’s done this because she didn’t want the public (or some board members) to find out what’s going on until the last minute when it’s too late to react. From http://trustees.uoregon.edu/meetings.
Alexandra Wallachly has some info in an Emerald story here, and I’ll post more later. Meanwhile if you see – or don’t see – something interesting, please post a comment.
Oregon Law says:
PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES WITH A GOVERNING BOARD
352.025 Legislative findings. (1) The Legislative Assembly finds that the State of Oregon will benefit from having public universities with governing boards that:
(a) Provide transparency, public accountability and support for the university.
(b) Are close to and closely focused on the individual university.
(c) Do not negatively impact public universities that do not have governing boards.
(d) Lead to greater access and affordability for Oregon residents and do not disadvantage Oregon students relative to out-of-state students.
(e) Act in the best interests of both the university and the State of Oregon as a whole.
(f) Promote the academic success of students in support of the mission of all education beyond high school as described in ORS 351.009.
(2) The Legislative Assembly also finds that:
(a) Even with universities with governing boards, there are economy-of-scale benefits to having a coordinated university system.
(b) Even with universities with governing boards, shared services may continue to be shared among universities.
(c) Legal title to all real property, whether acquired before or after the creation of a governing board, through state funding, revenue bonds or philanthropy, shall be taken and held in the name of the State of Oregon, acting by and through the governing board.
(d) The Legislative Assembly has a responsibility to monitor the success of governing boards at fulfilling their missions, their compacts and the principles stated in this section. [2013 c.768 §1]
The Legislature has passed that responsibility to the HECC. Executive Director Ben Cannon’s proposal for this is here, well worth reading it all:
Workgroup recommendations will be advisory to the Executive Director. HECC staff will make a
final recommendation to the Commission for an evaluation framework in summer, 2015. The
Commission-adopted framework will be employed in Fall 2015 for evaluations of the three
institutions whose boards assumed governance responsibility July 1, 2014 (UO, OSU, and PSU). All
seven public institutions will be evaluated annually using the framework starting in Fall 2016.
The work group will convene January 2015 – June 2015 and will use the following legislative
guidance to frame its work and outcomes:
ORS 352.061(2) stipulates that the HECC’s evaluations of universities must include:
A report on the university’s achievement of outcomes, measures of progress, goals and
targets as described in the university’s achievement compact with the Oregon Education
An assessment of the university’s progress toward achieving the mission of all education
beyond high school as described in ORS 351.009 (the 40-40-20 goal); and
An assessment as to how well the establishment of a governing board at the university
comports with the findings set forth in ORS 352.025.
ORS 352.061(2)(c) also requires that the HECC assess university governing boards against the
findings set forth in ORS 352.025, including that governing boards:
Provide transparency, public accountability and support for the university.
Are close to and closely focused on the individual university.
Do not negatively impact public universities that do not have governing boards.
Lead to greater access and affordability for Oregon residents and do not disadvantage
Oregon students relative to out-of-state students.
Act in the best interests of both the university and the State of Oregon as a whole.
Promote the academic success of students in support of the mission of all education beyond
high school as described in ORS 351.009 (the 40-40-20 goal).
ORS 352.025 notes four additional Legislative findings:
Even with universities with governing boards, there are economy-of-scale benefits to having
a coordinated university system.
Even with universities with governing boards, shared services may continue to be shared
Legal title to all real property, whether acquired before or after the creation of a governing
board, through state funding, revenue bonds or philanthropy, shall be taken and held in the
name of the State of Oregon, acting by and through the governing board.
The Legislative Assembly has a responsibility to monitor the success of governing boards at
fulfilling their missions, their compacts and the principles stated in this section.
The HECC has now released its workplan, here:
“The materials for this portion of the agenda are not yet complete”. The meeting is Monday at 3PM, Room 402 in the Alumni Center. BOT Secretary Angela Wilhelms has done her best to evade the intent of public meetings law a few times before, this is getting pretty shameless. Coltrane will present the proposal. Full dump here:
A reader passes along this Brad Shelton powerpoint, which among other things documents the $1.5M Moffitt to Moffitt transfer:
The bottom line though, is that there’s plenty of water in the well. Or at least that’s what Brad Shelton was telling UO’s academic deans in September:
I wonder what changed?
2/4/2015 update: The Senate Executive Committee met today. The sudden cuts to graduate fellowships in some UO departments, right in the middle of grad recruiting, got some serious attention. Senate President Kyr is going to ask the Senate Budget Committee to look into the situation and report back to the Senate ASAP.
Meanwhile, in the absence of any information from President Coltrane or Provost Bronet, the rumors are flying. Please post yours in the comments, whilst adhering to the one cuss-word limit.
Isn’t it odd how it only takes Johnson Hall 3 hours to spam the entire university with a witch-hunt email accusing a professor and two archivists of an “unlawful release” of UO archives, but when it comes to something as crucial as graduate student fellowships, they wait until departments are bringing students to campus to tell us sorry, they spent that money on something else?
Speaking of where they spent the money, the Senate Exec Meeting was attended by UO’s new VP for Collaboration Chuck Triplett, who is tasked with spying on the faculty and reporting back to Board Secretary Angela Wilhelms. Pernsteiner paid Triplett $72K, but Angela Wilhelms is giving him $130K, and didn’t even make him go through an affirmative action compliant search. No wonder he’s so happy:
What are the chances that chief collaborator Triplett will relay the news to the Board of Trustees that UO’s spending priorities are out of whack? How much are we paying Wilhelms?
2/4/2015: UO cutting grad student fellowships?
That’s the rumor. If true, it means Chuck Lillis has decided that it would be more fun to play with UO if it were out of the AAU. If you know something, say something.
Job ad here. Rumor has it that Board Secretary Angela Wilhelms wants a Chuck Triplett type, who will keep her and Chairman Chuck Lillis informed about exactly what UO’s President is up to:
Title: Senior Executive Assistant
The University of Oregon seeks applications for the Senior Executive Assistant for the Office of the President position. The Office of the President is the chief executive office for the University of Oregon. The office consists of the president, chief of staff, and several high-level executive and administrative support positions. The office staff works to provide efficient and responsible operation of the president’s office in support of the president’s initiatives and priorities in service to the students, staff, and faculty, as well as the Board of Trustees and external partners of the institution.
12/14/2014: Video of the Senate meeting is now available:
12/10/2014 PM update:
Alexandra Wallachly from the Emerald has posted a report on the meeting, here.
On the Board meeting Thursday: I think it’s important to show up at the Board meeting Thursday at 8AM in the Alumni Center. While the board has backed off on the latest power grab, there’s plenty of potential for surprises, those making public comments deserve some supporters, and it’s important that the Board sees that the faculty take what’s been happening very seriously. And I hear someone will be passing out “Save our Senate” buttons.
On the Senate meeting today: I got there at the very end. I’d love it if someone would send me some notes or post them. People tell me it was standing room only, and filled with dismay and outrage over what’s going on with our administration.
The Senate passed an amended version of the motion below, opposing the Triplett/Park power grab. The fact that they did this even after Coltrane announced the Board would withdraw the motion at his suggestion shows how deep the mistrust of Johnson Hall has become. Coltrane and Bronet need to take charge of that snake-pit, decisively and soon.
The Senate then apparently wrote and approved a second motion, directing the Academic Integrity Task Force to investigate the administration’s “alleged plans to establish groundwork for disciplinary procedures” against Philosophy Dept Chair Bonnie Mann and other faculty who refused to issue “fraudulent” grades. Apparently there is also an accusation that a CAS administrator not only gave out grades for courses, but then raised them after students complained. I don’t know if the TAIF will also investigate that.
I’ll post the video when available, and I expect the motions (passed unanimously?) will be on the Senate website soon, here. Meanwhile check Try Bree Nicolello’s twitter reports on the meeting: https://twitter.com/breenicolello.
12/10/2014 update: (see below for Coltrane response)
Sorry, I’m at the Board committee meetings, no live-blog.