The latest on the meltdown of UO’s leadership, from the Eugene Weekly. This is about the Dean who accused a sophomore of harassment, over an art project. Five months later UO’s investigation concludes:
“Taken as a whole, the information gathered in the investigation is such that no reasonable decision maker could find that Respondent violated the discrimination policy,” the August 27 notice says. “Therefore, at the threshold review, the Complaint is dismissed.”
That’s a pretty high bar. They could have cut Zaretsky a little slack – maybe “no more than 5% of reasonable decision makers …”.
But they went with zero. Nada. Zilch.
Which doesn’t stop Zaretsky from laying down a marker for anyone – e.g. UO President Karl Scholz – who might think about giving her some quiet time to work on her scholarship:
“Time will tell whether the debilitating coordinated and extensive campuswide antisemitic harassment, intimidation and threats I and other members of the Jewish campus community have endured for 22 months, continue this next academic year.”
Then to top it off we’ve got UO’s lawyer begging the student not to exercise their First Amendment rights or UO’s policy on academic freedom to talk to the press, lest Dean Zaretsky comes back with another expensive complaint:
On August 27, Nicole Commissiong, the UO’s chief civil rights officer and Title IX coordinator, told Steuerwald to “please be aware that the disclosure of the outcome of the investigation to third parties could result in harassment towards the complainant, as the complainant’s name [Which, for the record, is Adrian Parr Zaretsky: UOM] was previously disclosed in violation of the expectations for the investigation.”
You gotta love that “please”.