Press "Enter" to skip to content

UO Matters

University will pay 10% of price to help (some) new faculty buy a house!

This would be the University of Washington. Many other of our AAU public and private peers have various plans to help faculty with the cost of housing, ranging from university owned apartments and condos rented at subsidized rates to schemes where the university shares the cost of a house purchase, but also the equity. The Admin Bargaining Team’s Hal Sadofsky has conveniently omitted these, and their absence at UO, from his analysis of the cost of living at different AAU schools. Link here, please post links to other programs you know of in the comments:

OK, so how does Pres Karl Scholz’s pay compare?

From Physics Prof Raghu Parthasarathy’s excellent blog. Read the whole thing here, this is just an excerpt from his response to the email President Scholz had his flunky Provost what’s his name send to the faculty explaining why, at ~84% of the AAU average, we’re actually overpaid:

Let’s plot the president’s salary per undergraduate student for the AAU publics. (Of course, the proper scaling need not be linear in student number.) We’ll consider total undergraduate enrollment; the residents and non-resident take the same amount of supervision! Here’s the graph;

We’re not near the bottom. In fact, we’re near the top: #8 out of 38! Purdue’s president is the lowest (or, most sensibly) paid, and I’ll also note that Purdue has done a wonderful job freezing tuition rather than following every other school’s policy of sustained, exorbitant increases. But that’s another topic…

One could therefore make a solid case that the University of Oregon’s president is overpaid, relative to our state funding, or especially relative to the scale of the university. Of course, this isn’t the way presidential salaries are set. Moreover, this is irrelevant to UO faculty salary negotiations. But, if the administration wishes to emphasize the (poor) argument is that UO doesn’t have much money and so we can’t have the salary of our peers, or that “The cost of living in Eugene is lower than average at our AAU public peers” justifies low faculty salaries (from an email from our provost), I’d be more likely to buy these claims if they applied to administrative salaries as well. From what I can tell, they do not.

There are frustrating parts of the union proposals as well — I strongly dislike their focus on across-the-board raises rather than merit-based raises — but especially in recent, fascinating, data-driven statements, their arguments are clearer. At least, they haven’t driven me to spend hours making my own graphs.

Oregon’s Flagship University boasts of 26 straight years of enrollment increases

That would of course be Oregon State University. From their VP for Enrollment Jon Boeckenstedt’s blog. That’s right, OSU’s VP for Enrollment runs a very interesting blog on the side. Here at UO, the faculty can’t even get enrollment projections from the administration.

Orange (of course) for increases, blue for decreases:

What about Oregon’s other top-tier university? Not so good:

Why the difference? Maybe because OSU focuses on education (including online), while UO has become a football mill – a scheme which our administrators embraced while claiming it would boost enrollment.

What does our new President think of this? I don’t know, but there is no evidence he’s got a plan to deal with this except, of course, more football. Which is presumably what Uncle Phil’s Board hired him for.

President Scholz pays Provost Chris Long $670K to email faculty saying he wants to cut their pay

Today the faculty union had a bargaining session with the administration, but nothing happened on salaries because the administration still has not provided the union with the analysis discussed in the email sent out to the faculty under Provost Long’s name 2 weeks ago. As an aside, I can understand…

UO Prof Jennifer Freyd’s experiment with “Mandatory Supporting” ended by Dept of Ed bureaucrats*

Under the UO policy students could discuss incidents of sexual harassment confidentially with faculty, without fear that the faculty would be required to report their names and details against the students’ wishes. Now faculty must report these conversations or face discipline. I spent a good year or two of my…

UO’s new Chief PR Flack Carol Keese to replace “Around the 0”

Around the O is the official UO blog created in 2013 by Journalism Dean Tim Gleason on orders from Interim President Bob Berdahl in an attempt to replace UO Matters as the most popular source of news about UO. To boost readership they spammed everyone every few days, and when that didn’t work they tried gimmicks like free iPads to readers. Now Carol Reese, UO’s latest Chief PR Flack Vice President for Communications & Chief Marketing Officer, has decided that Around the O needs a redo, presumably to justify a bigger budget. Link to survey below.

My own thought is that it’s more than a little unseemly  for a university that is ostensibly devoted to the search for truth to spend tuition money hiring PR flacks to make the administrators look good – but I didn’t see a likert scale for that among the questions.

Dear Reader,
University Communications at the University of Oregon would like your opinion and a few minutes of your time to help improve the effectiveness of campus news and storytelling.
The final edition of the Around the O newsletter went out July 17. Current and recent Oregon news stories are available on the Oregon news page.
Now we’re hard at work developing a new and improved newsletter – and we need your help.
This survey takes about 7-9 minutes to complete. You will be asked questions about the kinds of topics, stories, and information you would like to see in a newsletter, set to debut this fall.
The results of the survey will be reported to the University Communications in aggregate form, and you will not be identified by name.
If you have questions about this survey, please contact me at [email protected]
Thank you in advance for helping University Communications tell the Oregon story.
To begin the survey, click on the following link or copy and paste the link into your browser.
Take the survey

PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL info from UO Foundation reveals huge raises for CEO Paul Weinhold, CFO Kelly Bosch

Thanks to an anonymous UOF Board member for suggesting I post this info.

From 2022 to 2023, UO Foundation CEO Paul (Ronald) Weinhold’s pay increased 23%, to $642,673. CFO Kelly Bosch’s pay increased $54%, to $317,846.

From 2013 to 2023, Weinhold’s pay increased by 101%. The pay for the average UO faculty member increased from $89,900 to $122,900, or 35%.

This money comes from an annual tax that the Foundation charges on the value of endowment gifts.

Weinhold also has a second job as Chairman of the Board at Summit Bank, where he recently appointed UO’s VP for Finance Jamie Moffitt as a board member. Summit is privately held, so no info on how much they make from these second jobs.

This of course is not “PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL” information, despite the Foundation’s scary words below. It comes from the IRS 990 forms that the Foundation is required to provide to anyone who asks, and which Propublico eventually posts here. Many not-for-profits post these on their websites, but not Weinhold and Bosch – who also run out the allowable extensions, so that the numbers for the fiscal year that ended June 30 will not be public until May 15 2015. I’ve posted the 2023 reports here and here.

From: “Kelly Bosch (UO Foundation Accounting Department)” <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: IRS 990 request [Request updated: #80355]
Date: July 9, 2024 at 7:51:58 AM PDT
To: Bill Harbaugh <[email protected]>
Reply-To: UO Foundation Accounting Department <[email protected]>
##- Please type your reply above this line -##

Your request (80355) has been updated. To add additional comments, reply to this email.

Papers I wish I’d written:

The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse: Evidence From The Decline of Vultures in India

  • Eyal Frank
  • Anant Sudarshan
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (FORTHCOMING)