Elsevier buys Academic Analytics competitor

2/3/2017: https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2017/02/03/elsevier-acquires-altmetrics-provider

10/27/2016: Provost drops $100K subscription to faulty Academic Analytics faculty data

This is great news. The $100K that Provost Coltrane just saved will allow UO to hire a tenure track humanities professor.

Oh wait, sorry. This comes from the Provost of Georgetown University, Robert Groves. Read his full blog post (yes, their provost has real blog, with comments) here:

With the rise of the Internet and digital records of publications, comparisons of quality of universities are increasingly utilizing statistics based on this documentation (e.g., the Times Higher Education university rankings). Many academic fields themselves are comparing the product of scholars by using counts of citations to work (through h-indexes and other statistics). Journals are routinely compared on their impact partially through such citation evidence. Some academic fields have rated their journals into tiers of “quality” based on these numbers. Platforms like Google Scholar and ResearchGate are building repositories of documentation of the work of scholars. …

In short, the quality of AA coverage of the scholarly products of those faculty studied are far from perfect. Even with perfect coverage, the data have differential value across fields that vary in book versus article production and in their cultural supports for citations of others’ work. With inadequate coverage, it seems best for us to seek other ways of comparing Georgetown to other universities. For that reason, we will be dropping our subscription to Academic Analytics.

12/11/2015: Faculty object to use of secret Academic Analytics data in tenure decisions

This is at Rutgers, InsideHigherEd has the report by Colleen Flaherty here. UO has had a contract with AA for several years, at about $100K.

The data available includes reports on individual faculty, such as this, from their website:

Screen Shot 2015-12-10 at 12.47.16 PM

Obviously more information is good, but the administration holds these reports pretty tight to the vest – even the departmental level ones. Maybe our Senate will need to look into how these data are being used.

Board of Trustees ASAC to meet Wed by phone to approve CoE diversity plan

Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 2:30 pm HEDCO Education Building, Room 240. It’s a telephonic meeting, but apparently there will be a phone there to listen in. The full draft of the proposal is here.

From what I can tell this is the first specific reference to the administration’s use of the confidential Academic Analytics data to rank departments.

Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.42.56 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.43.10 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.43.37 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.44.22 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.45.23 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.46.27 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.47.30 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.48.35 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.49.03 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.50.27 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.50.57 AM Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 10.51.13 AM